You can put off making a decision on the best 360-Degree appraisal applications for a long time, but what does that really achieve? It’s just a timewasting tactic that buys a small amount and may cost lots. The smarter approach is to thoroughly review your options and single out the one that has the most advantages going for it.
User surveys have found that computer based 360 degree surveys are preferred to paper surveys on a ratio of 24:1. Computer surveys are perceived as faster, easier to use and more anonymous, which has the cumulative effect of increasing response rates and respondent honesty significantly. Because 360-degree feedback is relatively easy to use, a lot of companies want to get the most they can out of the data. We generally recommend that 360s should not be used for the performance management: If people know that their ratings will impact someone’s performance review, and possibly their position and compensation, they may not respond as truthfully. Some may be more hesitant to provide useful feedback for improvement, for fear it will negatively impact the person’s career. On the other hand, it can create a competitive situation, leading to some toxic behavior among colleagues. The key is to detach the reality of what actually happens, how the participant actually behaves and what they actually do or feel from the 360 degree feedbackdata. Always refer to the fact the 360 degree feedbackdata is saying it is others’ view, perspective, angle, opinion, judgment, assessment, evaluation, thoughts, etc. Someone may easily show respect in the usual ways but be considered to be doing otherwise for a number of reasons. These reasons are the really interesting bit. The most significant insights from 360 degree reviews can be found by comparing self-perceptions to the perceptions of others. This way, an individual can clearly see their strengths and areas for development. Also, responses to open-ended questions are randomized and listed verbatim so the participant can see additional tone and context. A 360-degree assessment is a complex project, and talent professionals should communicate its value to the staff and provide any needed guidance. Organize a meeting to reassure the staff that they aren’t being put at risk and can share their thoughts openly and anonymously. Also, encourage them not to inflate (or degrade) ratings to make each other look better or worse. There are different methods for creating a 360 degree competency model, and each of them has its own pros and cons. You can use ready-made competency models that can be found on the Internet, work with consultants, or develop a competence model on your own. Whatever method you use, choose such competencies and indicators that are important and can be applied by review participants in their work. Indicators’ phrasing and their value should be clear to reviewers.
Despite the growing popularity of 360-degree feedback, only a few people have a detailed understanding of how it can be used to enhance-and indeed maximize-individual and organizational development. With this book, we aim to help people who are responsible for, or interested in, such development gain that understanding and determine whether 360-degree feedback will work in their organization. People can be upset from a 360 degree feedbackreview, but if they are working in a professional environment, particularly where the norm is emotional restraint and politeness, eg in the UK, they may of course think that they should not show their upsets. 360 degree feedbackis gathered from all around you: your direct reports, peers, internal and external “customers” (where appropriate) and your line manager. The results are then collated with your own responses and used to generate a report. The report is discussed in a confidential developmental conversation with a trained facilitator. There is a limit to the value anyone can get from 360 degree feedbackwithout support and coaching. You can use internal coaches to give feedback of course. You can provide them with the additional training they might need to feel really comfortable and confident in working through a 360 degree feedbackreport with someone. Making sense of 360 degree feedback system eventually allows for personal and organisational performance development.
360 Assessment Initiatives
We all have blindspots in our work life that impact our professional development. 360 reviews that are focused on personal performance improvement, not performance outcomes, can be an incredibly valuable tool for encouraging new perspectives and developing skills in a long term. If you want to improve 360 degree Feedback, start by rethinking how you implement it. As consultants Jack Zenger and Joseph Folkman have argued in the Harvard Business Review, the differences between successful and not-so-successful feedback are mostly organisational. Cronyism, leniency, and self-serving and other biases can be traced to the lack of accountability inherent in supervisor-only appraisals. When 360 degree feedbackis used as a supplement to supervisory review, many of the disadvantages of traditional systems can be overcome. The key thing to do with negative data in a 360 degree feedbacksession is to make sure the participants keep the doors open and their mind open to what it might mean. Usually the truly upsetting conclusions are only answered in proper dialogue in real life, not looking at a personal 360 degree feedbackreport. Not everyone will be with you on your journey so be prepared for the naysayers and the passive resistance. It may be within your own team and it may be in parts of your organisation. Use them as the source of critique, relish their resistance. If you are asking for their reluctant participation then approach it acknowledging their reluctance and ask them under what conditions they would be willing to do X or Y. Face the resistance but do not give up. People need to feel in control of their destiny - that is why a clear understanding of 360 appraisal is important to any forward thinking organisation.
Seeing how participants respond to the 360 degree feedbackprocess can be very interesting though in these circumstances, as just the idea of a 360 degree feedbackcan bring up high levels of concern or resistance that underlie the deeper, more serious, issues. By integrating multi-rater assessments like 360-degree feedback into their talent management plan, organizations can identify what’s most important for their strategic goals. The correct implementation of multi-rater assessments helps improve an organization’s financial performance, strengthen its existing talent, and enhance its leadership pipeline for the future. 360 degree feedbackgives many opportunities for stomach-wrenching realisations. Your job is not to prevent these but it is to prepare and support people through the process from first sight to full acceptance. In fact your job, working with the process of “managing resistance”, is to make it easy for people to truly see these insights and feel the consequences – to help them get off the “river-bank of upset” and back into the river of transformation. 360 reviews are personal and help employees to develop their business and interpersonal skills, and shouldn't focus on the delivery of targets and outcomes. Everybody can improve no matter what level they're at. 360 reviews are therefore useful for everyone from the CEO to middle management to entry level employees. 360-degree feedback processes may encourage an organizational climate where people feel free to ask, give, and receive feedback in person as part of the normal day-to-day course of doing business rather than waiting for formal ratings. Then, the periodic 360-degree ratings can serve to reinforce this feedback-rich climate by more systematically maintaining attention to different views about performance and the value that is placed on monitoring whether others' performance expectations are being met. Looking into 360 feedback software can be a time consuming process.
360 Degree Feedback Data Is Easy To Misinterpret
To add significant value to organizations to create competitive advantage, 360-degree feedback systems need to be effectively implemented. Effective implementation involves many factors, including clarity of purpose, involvement and ownership of significant stakeholders, an organizational climate of open communication and trust, and a consistent application of integrated HR systems. People tend to be quite candid when they provide input to colleagues, whether the information is to be used developmentally or for performance. If an organization truly fears the loss of developmental feedback, a practical solution is to divide the survey into two partsone developmental and one evaluativeso respondents have an opportunity to provide feedback on some items that are only developmental (and are not shared with the supervisor). 360-degree feedback does not only help employees. It can also help leaders make better career development plans. The insight into team dynamics helps managers develop more effective training plans. This leveling up of current employees addresses skill gaps and can boost retention. A common mistake when collecting 360-degree feedback is not spending the time to select the ideal rater group. The quality of the data is dependent on the raters. Picking people who are familiar with the leader’s performance and who will provide balanced feedback is key. Some 360 degree competencies are seen as best judged by those senior to you, eg strategic thinking or managing politics. Some competencies are best judged by those you are managing. Examples of these include: motivates others, sets clear objectives, tackles performance issues, etc. Others are best judged by you yourself, such as managing performance even under pressure, being sensitive to feedback – not that other people’s views are not valid of course, but you know better than others how you really feel. Analysis and decision making become easier when an understanding of what is 360 degree feedback is woven into the organisational fabric.
The key to a successful 360 degree project is your commitment and being very clear what you can promise and the concerns you have. For instance, you might want to take a stand to only do 360 degree feedbackif the participant has three follow-up coaching sessions as a minimum. Employees view 360 degree performance information from multiple perspectives as fair, accurate, credible, and motivating. Employees are often more strongly motivated to change their work behaviors to attain the esteem of their coworkers than to win the respect of their supervisor alone. A questionnaire used for 360 Degree Feedback typically contains items that are rated on a 4 to 7 point scale. These items may be developed to measure different dimensions of job performance (e.g., communication, teamwork, leadership, initiative, judgment, ...). Questionnaires also typically include one or more open-ended questions to solicit written feedback. The more perspectives you seek out in the 360 degree process – the less likely your reviews are to fall prey to unconscious bias. Unfortunately, bias does creep into the review process – with men more likely to receive evidenced feedback on technical skills than women. 360 degree feedbackprovides a valuable source of developmental and appraisal information for employees, but the substantial benefits are available only if the predictable objections are anticipated and addressed. Project administrators and the design team should anticipate a blizzard of employee concerns and criticisms and be ready to respond to them effectively. The specificity/anonymity conundrum takes another turn when the idea of 360 degree feedback is involved.
Improving Productivity & Working Relationships
Effective communication is paramount to the success of the 360 degree feedbacksystem. Once the objectives are clearly stated, they must be communicated to all employees. Anticipating concerns and communicating how the organization will address challenges smoothes the adoption of the 360 degree feedbackprocess. 360 degree feedbackdraws on the principles of wider involvement and consultation evident in employee attitude and opinion surveys, but with a focus on individual performance rather than organisational culture and climate. When a 360 degree feedbackprocess has been in use for several years and people trust the results, then the 360 degree feedbackmeasures are useful as one facet of the retention decision process. However, multisource systems are not likely to be the primary element of these types of decision processes because those who provide feedback do so voluntarily. You can discover supplementary intel regarding 360-Degree appraisal applications on this Wikipedia entry.
Related Articles:
Additional Information On 360-Degree appraisal technologies
Supplementary Insight With Regard To 360 degree appraisal technologies
Further Information With Regard To 360-Degree feedback technologies
Supplementary Information With Regard To 360-Degree feedback projects
More Information On 360 degree review expectations
Additional Insight On 360 degree review projects
Additional Information With Regard To 360-Degree review instruments