From a676950b28f74722bac132e49004aa0aca1b4f03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "psyc://psyced.org/~lynX" <@> Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 15:39:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] criticism of "id" was inaccurate. fixed. --- bench/benchmark.org | 11 +++++++---- bench/packets/chat_msg.xml | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/bench/benchmark.org b/bench/benchmark.org index 4382cdb..05bcf77 100644 --- a/bench/benchmark.org +++ b/bench/benchmark.org @@ -97,11 +97,14 @@ for future projects: #+INCLUDE: packets/chat_msg.json src js #+INCLUDE: packets/chat_msg.psyc src psyc -Why PSYC doesn't have an id? Because packet counting from contexts -and circuits is automatic: The packet already has a number just by -being there. +# Why PSYC doesn't have an id? Because for most operations they aren't +# needed: PSYC has automatic packet counting from contexts and circuits. +# Therefore, the packet already has an id just by being there. +# Should you want to tag a packet anyway, you can do so by adding a _tag. +# +# Update: XMPP doesn't *need* to have an id there, so we can just remove it. -Also, PSYC by default doesn't mention a "resource" in XMPP terms, +Little difference: PSYC by default doesn't mention a "resource" in XMPP terms, instead it allows for more addressing schemes than just PSYC. ** A new status updated activity diff --git a/bench/packets/chat_msg.xml b/bench/packets/chat_msg.xml index eec1675..bcceaa4 100644 --- a/bench/packets/chat_msg.xml +++ b/bench/packets/chat_msg.xml @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ - + Art thou not Romeo, and a Montague?