readme: move error handling to sub-objectives of a type system
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									a068dfc021
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						c63b42c414
					
				
					 1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -32,7 +32,7 @@ negatively charged towards | ||||||
|  - no codegen |  - no codegen | ||||||
|  - no inline assembly |  - no inline assembly | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| ## todo | ## wip | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  - `+=`, `-=`, and the rest of the gang |  - `+=`, `-=`, and the rest of the gang | ||||||
|  - no `for` yet |  - no `for` yet | ||||||
|  | @ -42,13 +42,13 @@ negatively charged towards | ||||||
|  - no `module`, `import` yet |  - no `module`, `import` yet | ||||||
|  - no interfaces yet |  - no interfaces yet | ||||||
|  - no enums yet |  - no enums yet | ||||||
|  - no error handling yet (`call() or {blah}`) |  | ||||||
|  - no `?` postfix operator yet (`call()?`) |  | ||||||
|  - no generics yet |  - no generics yet | ||||||
|  - no attributes yet (`[live]`, `[skip]`) |  - no attributes yet (`[live]`, `[skip]`) | ||||||
|  - no `defer` yet |  - no `defer` yet | ||||||
|  - no operator overloading methods yet |  - no operator overloading methods yet | ||||||
|  - do we really want a type system (optionals included) |  - do we really want a type system (optionals included) | ||||||
|  |     - no error handling yet (`call() or {blah}`) | ||||||
|  |     - no `?` postfix operator yet (`call()?`) | ||||||
|  - do we really want to output c |  - do we really want to output c | ||||||
|  - do we really want to output llvm |  - do we really want to output llvm | ||||||
|  - do we really want to output x86 |  - do we really want to output x86 | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue