diff --git a/src/ameba/rules/comparison_to_boolean.cr b/src/ameba/rules/comparison_to_boolean.cr
index 4bf6cedd..af4e5aaa 100644
--- a/src/ameba/rules/comparison_to_boolean.cr
+++ b/src/ameba/rules/comparison_to_boolean.cr
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 #
 # For example, these are considered invalid:
 #
-# ```crystal
+# ```
 # foo == true
 # bar != false
 # false === baz
diff --git a/src/ameba/rules/unless_else.cr b/src/ameba/rules/unless_else.cr
index 3e98a63b..7e46c917 100644
--- a/src/ameba/rules/unless_else.cr
+++ b/src/ameba/rules/unless_else.cr
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 #
 # For example, the rule considers these valid:
 #
-# ```crystal
+# ```
 # unless something
 #   :ok
 # end
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 #
 # But it considers this one invalid as it is an `unless` with an `else`:
 #
-# ```crystal
+# ```
 # unless something
 #   :one
 # else
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 # The solution is to swap the order of the blocks, and change the `unless` to
 # an `if`, so the previous invalid example would become this:
 #
-# ```crystal
+# ```
 # if something
 #   :two
 # else