Use issue expectation helpers in Performance::FirstLastAfterFilter rule spec

spec/ameba/rule/performance/first_last_after_filter_spec.cr

@@ -5,74 +5,70 @@ module Ameba::Rule::Performance
 
   describe FirstLastAfterFilter do
     it "passes if there is no potential performance improvements" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_no_issues subject, <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 1 }
         [1, 2, 3].reverse.select { |e| e > 1 }
         [1, 2, 3].reverse.last
         [1, 2, 3].reverse.first
         [1, 2, 3].reverse.first
-      )
-      subject.catch(source).should be_valid
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     it "reports if there is select followed by last" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_issue subject, <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.last
-      )
-      subject.catch(source).should_not be_valid
+                # ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: Use `reverse_each.find {...}` instead of `select {...}.last`
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     it "does not report if source is a spec" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_no_issues subject, path: "source_spec.cr", code: <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.last
-      ), "source_spec.cr"
-      subject.catch(source).should be_valid
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     it "reports if there is select followed by last?" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_issue subject, <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.last?
-      )
-      subject.catch(source).should_not be_valid
+                # ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: Use `reverse_each.find {...}` instead of `select {...}.last?`
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     it "reports if there is select followed by first" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_issue subject, <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.first
-      )
-      subject.catch(source).should_not be_valid
+                # ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: Use `find {...}` instead of `select {...}.first`
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     it "does not report if there is selected followed by first with arguments" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_no_issues subject, <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |n| n % 2 == 0 }.first(2)
-      )
-      subject.catch(source).should be_valid
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     it "reports if there is select followed by first?" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_issue subject, <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.first?
-      )
-      subject.catch(source).should_not be_valid
+                # ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: Use `find {...}` instead of `select {...}.first?`
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     it "does not report if there is select followed by any other call" do
-      source = Source.new %(
+      expect_no_issues subject, <<-CRYSTAL
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.size
         [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.any?
-      )
-      subject.catch(source).should be_valid
+        CRYSTAL
     end
 
     context "properties" do
       it "allows to configure object_call_names" do
-        source = Source.new %(
-          [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.first
-        )
         rule = Rule::Performance::FirstLastAfterFilter.new
         rule.filter_names = %w(reject)
-        rule.catch(source).should be_valid
+
+        expect_no_issues rule, <<-CRYSTAL
+          [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.first
+          CRYSTAL
       end
     end
 
@@ -91,58 +87,12 @@ module Ameba::Rule::Performance
       issue.message.should eq "Use `find {...}` instead of `select {...}.first`"
     end
 
-    it "reports a correct message for first?" do
-      s = Source.new %(
-        [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.first?
-      ), "source.cr"
-      subject.catch(s).should_not be_valid
-      s.issues.size.should eq 1
-
-      issue = s.issues.first
-      issue.rule.should_not be_nil
-      issue.location.to_s.should eq "source.cr:1:11"
-      issue.end_location.to_s.should eq "source.cr:1:38"
-
-      issue.message.should eq "Use `find {...}` instead of `select {...}.first?`"
-    end
-
-    it "reports rule, pos and reverse message" do
-      s = Source.new %(
-        [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.last
-      ), "source.cr"
-      subject.catch(s).should_not be_valid
-      s.issues.size.should eq 1
-
-      issue = s.issues.first
-      issue.rule.should_not be_nil
-      issue.location.to_s.should eq "source.cr:1:11"
-      issue.end_location.to_s.should eq "source.cr:1:36"
-
-      issue.message.should eq "Use `reverse_each.find {...}` instead of `select {...}.last`"
-    end
-
     context "macro" do
       it "doesn't report in macro scope" do
-        source = Source.new %(
-          {{[1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2  }.last }}
-        )
-        subject.catch(source).should be_valid
+        expect_no_issues subject, <<-CRYSTAL
+          {{ [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2  }.last }}
+          CRYSTAL
       end
     end
-
-    it "reports a correct message for last?" do
-      s = Source.new %(
-        [1, 2, 3].select { |e| e > 2 }.last?
-      ), "source.cr"
-      subject.catch(s).should_not be_valid
-      s.issues.size.should eq 1
-
-      issue = s.issues.first
-      issue.rule.should_not be_nil
-      issue.location.to_s.should eq "source.cr:1:11"
-      issue.end_location.to_s.should eq "source.cr:1:37"
-
-      issue.message.should eq "Use `reverse_each.find {...}` instead of `select {...}.last?`"
-    end
   end
 end