From c9efe75b7786318915508ee42a0cfe04544521a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: buzz-lightsnack-2007
 <73412182+buzz-lightsnack-2007@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 23:52:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] update prompts to make clear the usage of chain-of-thought

---
 tests/config/prompts.json | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/config/prompts.json b/tests/config/prompts.json
index 1ea3462..cae24d8 100644
--- a/tests/config/prompts.json
+++ b/tests/config/prompts.json
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
 {
     "sample": "Here are some examples that have already been identified as either human-written or AI-written. ",
     "description": "Using the examples presented above, can you describe differences between works written by humans and by AI?",
-    "introduction": "Please help me determine whether the text was made by a human or an LLM:",
-    "classify": "Please help me determine whether this piece text above is written a human or by a large language model.",
-    "judge": "Try to consider both options before coming up with a single-choice conclusion.",
-    "answer format": "Your response must always end with your verdict in a new line that either contains “human” or “AI” without any additional words, quotation marks, formatting, or punctuations. Examples of responses include: \n“ABC \n\nhuman”\nor\n“DEF \n\nAI”\n\nwhere “ABC” and “DEF” are placeholders for your explanations."
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+    "bridge": "Now, keep in mind how those examples were classified.",
+    "introduction": "Below is some text that I need help on:",
+    "classify": "Do you think this text was highly likely to be written by a human or by an LLM?",
+    "judge": "Let us evaluate both options before coming up with a conclusion.",
+    "answer format": "Having stated that, please summarize that answer in one word: either “human” or “AI”. "
+}