\";\n",
+ "\n",
+ "\n",
+ " display(HTML(TEXT_OUTPUT));\n",
+ "\n",
+ "\n",
" print((\"\\t\" + \":\\n\\t\\t\".join([TEXT_CATEGORY, \"\\n\\t\\t\".join((\"\\n\".join(STRINGS[GENERATION_TYPE][TEXT_CATEGORY][0:3])).split(\"\\n\"))])));\n",
" \n",
" print(\"\\n\");"
@@ -447,9 +630,9 @@
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"The models in use for this study are the following: \n",
- "- `llama3.1`\n",
- "- `phi3`\n",
- "- `gemini-1.5-pro`"
+ "- `gpt2`\n",
+ "- `gemma2:2b`\n",
+ "- `tinyllama`"
]
},
{
@@ -461,19 +644,41 @@
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 9,
+ "execution_count": 15,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
- "import ollama\n",
- "import google.generativeai as Gemini"
+ "import ollama"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": 19,
+ "metadata": {},
+ "outputs": [],
+ "source": [
+ "MODELS = [\"phi\", \"gemma2:2b\", \"tinyllama\"]"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
- "**Make sure to run Ollama before running any of the code below!**"
+ "Use this code below to start Ollama. You may safely stop it afterwards as it will still run in the background. "
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": null,
+ "metadata": {
+ "vscode": {
+ "languageId": "shellscript"
+ }
+ },
+ "outputs": [],
+ "source": [
+ "%%bash\n",
+ "ollama serve &"
]
},
{
@@ -484,68 +689,46 @@
]
},
{
- "cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 10,
+ "cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
- "outputs": [],
"source": [
- "for MODEL_NAME in [\"llama3.1\",\"phi3:latest\"]: \n",
- " ollama.pull(MODEL_NAME);"
+ "This section must only be run once per system. "
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": 20,
+ "metadata": {},
+ "outputs": [
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ }
+ ],
+ "source": [
+ "STATUS = display(HTML(''.join([\" \"])), display_id=True)\n",
+ "\n",
+ "for MODEL_INDEX in range(len(MODELS)): \n",
+ " MODEL_NAME = MODELS[MODEL_INDEX];\n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(''.join([\" \"])));\n",
+ "\n",
+ " ollama.pull(MODEL_NAME);\n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(''.join([\" \"])))"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
- "#### Model Set-Up"
- ]
- },
- {
- "cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 10,
- "metadata": {},
- "outputs": [
- {
- "name": "stdout",
- "output_type": "stream",
- "text": [
- "1 API keys loaded.\n",
- "Google Generative Model API key discovered.\n"
- ]
- }
- ],
- "source": [
- "SECRETS = {};\n",
- "\n",
- "def passwords_reload(): \n",
- " if (os.path.isdir(\"passwords\")): \n",
- " if len(list(os.walk('passwords/'))[0][2]): \n",
- "\n",
- " for PASSWORD_NAME in list(os.walk('passwords/'))[0][2]: \n",
- " DATA = open('/'.join(['passwords', PASSWORD_NAME]), 'r').read().strip();\n",
- "\n",
- " if (DATA): \n",
- " SECRETS[(PASSWORD_NAME.split('.txt'))[0]] = DATA;\n",
- "\n",
- " print(' '.join([str(len(SECRETS.keys())), \"API keys loaded.\"]))\n",
- " \n",
- " return SECRETS;\n",
- "\n",
- "passwords_reload();\n",
- "\n",
- "if ('GoogleGenerativeModel' in SECRETS.keys()): \n",
- " print(\"Google Generative Model API key discovered.\");\n",
- " Gemini.configure(api_key=SECRETS['GoogleGenerativeModel'])"
- ]
- },
- {
- "cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 11,
- "metadata": {},
- "outputs": [],
- "source": [
- "MODELS = {};\n",
- "MODELS[\"gemini-1.5-pro\"] = Gemini.GenerativeModel('gemini-1.5-pro-exp-0801');"
+ "#### Prompt Set-Up"
]
},
{
@@ -557,23 +740,16 @@
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 28,
+ "execution_count": 34,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": [
"PROMPTS = {};\n",
+ "RESULTS = {};\n",
+ "\n",
"PROMPTS[\"raw\"] = json.load(open(\"tests/prompts.json\"));"
]
},
- {
- "cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 13,
- "metadata": {},
- "outputs": [],
- "source": [
- "RESULTS = {};"
- ]
- },
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
@@ -597,7 +773,7 @@
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 19,
+ "execution_count": 41,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [
{
@@ -605,8 +781,7 @@
"output_type": "stream",
"text": [
"Below are some texts written by humans and by large language models.\n",
- "human:\n",
- "#1:\n",
+ "human #1:\n",
"Cars. Cars have been around since they became famous in the 1900s, when Henry Ford created and built the first ModelT. Cars have played a major role in our every day lives since then. But now, people are starting to question if limiting car usage would be a good thing. To me, limiting the use of cars might be a good thing to do.\n",
"\n",
"In like matter of this, article, \"In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars,\" by Elizabeth Rosenthal states, how automobiles are the linchpin of suburbs, where middle class families from either Shanghai or Chicago tend to make their homes. Experts say how this is a huge impediment to current efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipe. Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe...and up to 50 percent in some carintensive areas in the United States. Cars are the main reason for the greenhouse gas emissions because of a lot of people driving them around all the time getting where they need to go. Article, \"Paris bans driving due to smog,\" by Robert Duffer says, how Paris, after days of nearrecord pollution, enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city. It also says, how on Monday, motorist with evennumbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or be fined a 22euro fine 31. The same order would be applied to oddnumbered plates the following day. Cars are the reason for polluting entire cities like Paris. This shows how bad cars can be because, of all the pollution that they can cause to an entire city.\n",
@@ -614,7 +789,8 @@
"Likewise, in the article, \"Carfree day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota,\" by Andrew Selsky says, how programs that's set to spread to other countries, millions of Columbians hiked, biked, skated, or took the bus to work during a carfree day, leaving streets of this capital city eerily devoid of traffic jams. It was the third straight year cars have been banned with only buses and taxis permitted for the Day Without Cars in the capital city of 7 million. People like the idea of having carfree days because, it allows them to lesson the pollution that cars put out of their exhaust from people driving all the time. The article also tells how parks and sports centers have bustled throughout the city uneven, pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks rushhour restrictions have dramatically cut traffic and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up. Having no cars has been good for the country of Columbia because, it has aloud them to repair things that have needed repairs for a long time, traffic jams have gone down, and restaurants and shopping districts have popped up, all due to the fact of having less cars around.\n",
"\n",
"In conclusion, the use of less cars and having carfree days, have had a big impact on the environment of cities because, it is cutting down the air pollution that the cars have majorly polluted, it has aloud countries like Columbia to repair sidewalks, and cut down traffic jams. Limiting the use of cars would be a good thing for America. So we should limit the use of cars by maybe riding a bike, or maybe walking somewhere that isn't that far from you and doesn't need the use of a car to get you there. To me, limiting the use of cars might be a good thing to do.\n",
- "#2:\n",
+ "\n",
+ "human #2:\n",
"Transportation is a large necessity in most countries worldwide. With no doubt, cars, buses, and other means of transportation make going from place to place easier and faster. However there's always a negative pollution. Although mobile transportation are a huge part of daily lives, we are endangering the Earth with harmful greenhouse gases, which could be suppressed.\n",
"\n",
"A small suburb community in Germany called Vauban, has started a \"carfree\" lifestyle. In this city, markets and stores are placed nearby homes, instead of being located by farend highways. Although Vauban is not completely carfree, 70% of Vauban families do not own cars Even a large 57% of families stated to have sold their cars to move to Vauban. Some families have even said to be less stressed depending on car transportation. Cars are responsible for about 12% of greenhouse gases, and can even be up to 50% in some carintensive areas in the United States.\n",
@@ -624,7 +800,8 @@
"Could you imagine a day without seeing a single car being used? This phenomenon occurs once a year in Bogota, Colombia. With the exception of buses and taxis being used, cars are to be left unattended for an entire day. Having a carfree day just once a year can even reduce the pollution slightly. The day without cars is part of a campaign that originated in Bogota in the mid 1990s. This campaign has renewed and constructed numerous bicycle paths and sidewalks all over the city. Parks and sports centers have also sprung from this campaign. Devoting your time to a carfree lifestyle has it's hassles, but in hindsight, it has it's benefits.\n",
"\n",
"To conclude, living a carfree lifestyle does not seem like a possibility in this day and age, however managing the use of cars and pollution is something every country should take time investing in. Think about how much of an impact it would be if everywhere worldwide would take part in airpollution reduction. Mobile transportation is lifestyle in a sense, and being dependent on cars or other means of transportation can impact the health of the Earth and even ourselves.\n",
- "#3:\n",
+ "\n",
+ "human #3:\n",
"\"America's love affair with it's vehicles seems to be cooling\" says Elisabeth rosenthal. To understand rosenthal's perspective, it is easier to suggest that America's car usage is decreasing slowly. This isn't necessarily bad in the sense that it has certain positive effects. The advantages of limiting car usage includes an increase in security and health, along with a decrease in pollution and dependence.\n",
"\n",
"Firstly, when car usage is limited security and health is more likely to be guaranteed. The feeling of being secure is highly important to individuals everywhere. For example, many people in colombia used public transportation during a car free day \"leaving the streets of this capital city \", according to Andrew Selsky, \"eerily devoid of traffic jams\". The complications that stem from traffic jams end with a feeling of confidence. The plan to get from point A to B was more simple just a second ago. This complication in your personal plans leads you to become stressed as a feeling of doubt overcomes all thoughts. If car usage was limited, there would be a control on how much traffic accumulates thus minimizing chance of stress. As Heidrun Walter states \"when i had a car i was always tense. I'm much happier this way\". not only does car usage minimize conditions detrimental to health, it also enlarges your capacity for exercise. The main purpose of the car is to get someone from one place to another. when an important job takes over your personal life, it becomes difficult to do things most enjoyed in life. limits on car usage forces you to stay in shape. According to Andrew Selsky \"parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughout the city\". Less cars means healthier and natural situations. With parks and sport centers becoming more efficient, it becomes easier to find a more physically active population. Overall, less usage on cars minimizes stress and increases health.\n",
@@ -634,13 +811,15 @@
"Additionally, it would lower the dependence on cars. Many people today find that their car is so useful. While it has many features and is a form of transportation, many do not figure what they would do if they did not have such a possesion. The development of people and their interaction with technology has left a wide gap between historic, natural ways and what is thought of as modern society. Being dependent is not always good for individuals. As david goldberg says \"all our development since world war II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change\". Many people could disagree and wonder why it is necessary to change our ways especially if we are so highly devloped. If being developed means being dependent on a harmful machine, then it could not be effective devlopment. According to Elisabeth Rosenthal \"cashstrapped americans could not afford new cars, and the unemployed were't going to work anyway\". Many people can't have the precious luxury of private transportation in the first place. Those who have had it have become distant to a more natural society. Peope have become so use to having cars that they have become oblivious to the significant effects. With limits on car usage , these effcts could be controlled.\n",
"\n",
"To conclude, the advantages of limiting car usage is an increase in health, along with a decrease in pollution, and less dependence on cars. limiting car usage is a positive way to enfore an organized and clean environment, and ensure health and security of those who live in it. This is one reason America can be reffered to as a succesful country. It is not that America has decreased use of vehicles, but the fact that they have done what is best for majority.\n",
- "#4:\n",
+ "\n",
+ "human #4:\n",
"How often do you ride in a car? Do you drive a one or any other motor vehicle to work? The store? To the mall? Have you ever thought about how many people in the world do that exact same thing travel to every destination using a fuel powered motorvehicle. Not many people realize the intensive damage that they're doing when they turn their key in the ignition. What if you didn't drive to work today? If you're like any regular car user, the thought \"What?! I could never survive without my car!\" may run through your mind. It is possible though, to live without your main mean of transport. Just look at cities like cuban, Paris, and Bogota each one has in some way restricted their people's usage of cars and they actually enjoy it! If you limit your car usage, it can intern result in many advantages and benefits in yourself and in your community.\n",
"\n",
"A not so recognized benefit to giving up your car usage would be the positive consequences it has on your health. In source 1, Heidrun Walter states that \"When he had a car, he was always tense. He's much happier without it.\" Think about it, imagine all the angry road rage you experience while driving. That surely does not have a positive effect on your mood or health. Driving takes a copious amount of focus and mental activity, such as, trying to navigate, dealing with bad drivers, etc., that after a short period of time, you're stressed out and tired. In cities like New York and Paris, the population is high. This leads to congestion in the streets and excessive amounts of pollution. Warm layers of air, according to Robert Duffer in \"Paris bans driving due to smog,\" traps the car emissions. How is that healthy? He also states that Paris had to enforce a temporary driving ban after the pollution levels reached an all time record. After a few days of less driving the pollution went way down. Since people aren't driving, they have to find other means of transport. This could include walking, biking, or skating to destinations. Those are all physical excercises! Your body is getting to work out and you'll mentally feel fresher more than you would sitting in a car.\n",
"\n",
"Taking a break from driving also can help with the overall look of your city. Pollution doesn't cause the flowers to grow. It certainly doesn't smell nice. It sets a filter over the town and gives off a \"dirty\" vibe. With less driving, there is less nasty pollution being emitted, therefore leading to a cleaner community. In Elisabeth Rosenthal's article, \"In German Suburb, Life goes on Without Cars,\" she gives the good point that since there is a restriction on car and motor vehicle transportation, there is going to be more walkers. If you have tons of people taking the sidewalks instead of the roads, you might need a few more pathways and closer stores that are in walking distance. Andrew Selsky states that \"Parks and sports centers have bloomed throughout the city uneven pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks... and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up.\" As stated previously, pollution is not benefiting the environment. Organizations such as the Envronmental Protection Agency in the U.S., are promoting \"car reduced\" communities, says Rosenthal. These communities have far less pollution and are much cleaner. Cities are also promoting this idea and are having days devoted to \"nocar driving.\" In Bogota, Colombia, they hold an anual \"carfree\" day where only buses and taxis are permitted. Any other drivers would be fined. Although fining someone for using a posession they own might ruffle some feathers, it did have a successful turn out and significantly reduced the \"smog.\" In conclusion, although the idea of giving up our precious automobiles for walking to our destination might sound impossible, it's not. Reducing our driving can lead to many benefits and advantages in our daily lives. These include an increase in health, an improved look to our cities, and an improved environment all around us.\n",
- "#5:\n",
+ "\n",
+ "human #5:\n",
"Cars are a wonderful thing. They are perhaps one of the worlds greatest advancements and technologies. Cars get us from point a to point i. That is exactly what we want isnt it? We as humans want to get from one place to anther as fast as possiile. Cars are a suitaile to do that. They get us across the city in a matter of minutes. Much faster than anyhting else we have. A train isnt going to get me across the city as fast as my car is and neither is a puilic ius, iut those other forms of transportation just might ie the way to go. Don't get me wrong, cars are an aisolutly amazing thing iut, mayie they just cause way to much stress, and mayie they hurt our environment in ways that we don't think they will. With a ius or a train you do not have to worry aiout washing your car or getting frustrated when stuck in a iad traffic jam on I4. Also there is not as much pollution in air hurting our environment. You might not think so, iut there are many advantages to limiting our car usage.\n",
"\n",
"One advantage that not only humans would ienefit from, iut also plants and animals is that there would ie a lot less pollution in the air hurting out environment. Right now our cars give off gases that are extremely harmful towards our environment. These gases are called green house gases and come out of the exhaust pipes in our cars. Your car alone docent give off much gas iut collectively, our cars give off enormous amounts of gases. This is especially true in iig cities like France. In France, their pollution level was so high it was record ireaking. due to that france decided to enforce a partial ian on cars. This is descriied in the second article \" Paris ians driving due to smog\", iy Roiert Duffer, \" On Monday motorists with evennumiered license plates were orderd to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22euro fine 31. The same would apply to oddnumiered plates the following day.\" After France limited driving there congestion was down iy 60 percent. \" Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France\". So after five days of intense smog, 60 percent of it was clear after not using cars for only a little while. Even across the world in Bogota, columiia they are limiting driving and reducing smog levels. In the third article \"carfree day is spinning into a iig hit in Bogota\", iy Andrew Selsky, it descriies the annual carfree day they have to reduce smog. \" the goal is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog\". So all over the world people are relizing that without cars, we are insuring the safety and well ieing of our environment.\n",
@@ -648,31 +827,24 @@
"The second advantage that would come with limiting car use is less stress. Everyone knows that driving a car causes emence amounts of stress. Getting caught in traffic is a major cause of stress in someones life. having to repeating wash your car just to get it dirt again causes stress. Having people in the iack of your car screaming and yelling all while music is ilasting, causes stress. So oiviously driving causes stress. If we were to limit our car usage we would not ie as stressed as we usually are. There would ie no traffic, no car washes and no one screaming in a small confineded space. In the first article \" In German Suiuri, life goes on without cars\", iy Elisaieth Rosenthal, a citizen named humdrum Walter, states \" When i had a car i was always tense. I'm much happier this way\". So with out the stress of a car humdrum Walter is a looser and happier person, less stress equals happier person. In the third article, \" Carfree dai is spinning into a iig hit in Bogota\", iy Andrew Selsky, it states \" It's a good opportunity to take away stress...\". If we have the opportunity to take away stress, why not take it. It is a huge advantage in our lives to limit driving if it takes away stress. No one wants stress, no one needs stress, and if we have an opportunity to take some of the stress away, take that opportunity.\n",
"\n",
"In conclusion, there are many advantages to limiting car use, one ieing theat we get to help the environment and two ieing that it helps reduce stress. Our environment is already screwed up in so many ways, if we can help it to iecome the healthy environment it once was, then do it. Stress is proven to impare your personal health, no one wants to ie unhealthy and no one wants stress in their life. If you want the environment to get ietter and you want to reduce stress in your life then take this advantage and impliment it. Some might not think that this is an advantage, iut i just explained that it is a clear advantege that has ieen proved to help the enviornment and reduce stress. Limiting car use is a very effective advantage that really does work in more than one place.\n",
- "#6:\n",
- "The electrol college system is an unfair system, people don't have the right to select their own president, they dont have the right to select a president. Because, when people vote they are technically voting for the electors for a candied. That candidate can be a democratic or a republican. In source two it states that electors can choose there opposing candidate. Which declines the the whole voting process. Why do we vote? we vote to select a leader who will defend this country and make america a place of opportunity. The most important reason why the electrol cllege is unfair because of the \" winners it take all\" rule.\n",
"\n",
- "We as american people cannot choose their own government, as it says in source two, that when voters vote they are voting for the candidates electors. Each state gets one vote and then the electors can choose who they want for president. In source two it states that the electoral college consists of 538 electors and the most amount of electoral votes is 270, in order to pick an president. Also in source two it states that the number of electors we have equals to the amount of members of congress we have. I propose a new system by only letting the American people select our president by votes counted all up by each state, for example if we didn't have have electoral college, then it would be a fair vote because people votes would count the number that adds up with all votes for one candidates that will oppose another candidates and there would be technically no tie it would either ,more or less, but if we still had the electoral college then the vote would not be equally fair because if the majority of a state for example chose republican candidate, then that would be vague because some people choose democratic and there vote did not really count. but without the electoral college, than everyones vote counts and each candidates gets vote from every one, not only electoral.\n",
- "\n",
- "In source two it says that electoral who have been select by the state can choose their opposing candidtade, which is more disatvantgeing to the american people and america's future. for example if one state candidate was choosen for republican and they were \"faithless\" as it says in source two, and chose the democratic party it would be very unfortunate for the republicans because than there would be no point of the votes the republican supporters have voted for. It only comes once every four years, this is very important to the american people, on choosing who they want for the future of america.\n",
- "\n",
- "In source two and three it states the rule \" winner take it all\". The votes the other lose the, winning can take it all, that vote that they take from the losing does not count Because the people really didnt mean to vote for the candidate they don't want or the candidate they dont support, its like your money fell on the floor and someone just took it knowing its yours.\n",
- "\n",
- "In conclusion, the state senators should eliminate the electoral college because they count the majorty votes, and don't count other votes that is not popular as the other candidates vote. also because they can decide vote on an canditate they want based on their opinions and beliefs. and lastly because of the winner takes it all system which is bascially taking the losing candidates electoral votes.\n",
- "AI:\n",
- "#1:\n",
+ "AI #1:\n",
"Car-free cities have become a subject of increasing interest and debate in recent years, as urban areas around the world grapple with the challenges of congestion, pollution, and limited resources. The concept of a car-free city involves creating urban environments where private automobiles are either significantly restricted or completely banned, with a focus on alternative transportation methods and sustainable urban planning. This essay explores the benefits, challenges, and potential solutions associated with the idea of car-free cities. Benefits of Car-Free Cities Environmental Sustainability: Car-free cities promote environmental sustainability by reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Fewer cars on the road mean cleaner air and a significant decrease in the contribution to global warming. Improved Public Health: A reduction in automobile usage can lead to better public health outcomes. Fewer cars on the road result in fewer accidents and a safer urban environment for pedestrians and cyclists. Moreover, less air pollution can lead to reduced respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Efficient Use of Space: Car-free cities utilize urban space more efficiently. Parking lots and wide roads can be repurposed for green spaces, parks, and pedestrian zones, enhancing the overall quality of life in the city. Reduced Traffic Congestion: By eliminating or restricting car usage, traffic congestion is significantly reduced, leading to faster commute times and less frustration for residents and commuters. Cost Savings: Car ownership and maintenance can be expensive. Car-free cities allow residents to save money on vehicles, fuel, and insurance, improving their overall financial well-being. Challenges of Car-Free Cities Resistance to Change: Transitioning to a car-free city can face resistance from citizens, especially those who rely heavily on their cars for daily activities and commutes. Public Transportation Infrastructure: An effective public transportation system is crucial for the success of car-free cities. Cities need to invest in and expand their public transportation networks to ensure that people have viable alternatives to cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that rely on car-dependent customers may experience a decline in revenue in a car-free city. It's essential to address this economic impact and find ways to support affected businesses during the transition. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: The redesign of urban areas for car-free living requires significant planning and investment in infrastructure, which can be a lengthy and complex process. Solutions for Car-Free Cities Expand Public Transportation: Invest in the expansion and improvement of public transportation systems to provide convenient and affordable alternatives to private cars. Promote Active Transportation: Encourage walking and cycling by building bike lanes, pedestrian-friendly streets, and ensuring safe infrastructure for these activities. Implement Carpooling and Ride-Sharing: Promote carpooling and ride-sharing services to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road. Adopt Electric and Sustainable Transportation: Encourage the use of electric vehicles and promote sustainability by using renewable energy sources to power transportation. Education and Public Awareness: Educate citizens about the benefits of a car-free city and involve them in the planning process to increase support and understanding. Conclusion Car-free cities represent a vision for a sustainable and healthier urban future. While the transition to a car-free city is not without challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, and efficient urban living make it a compelling goal. Through a combination of investment in public transportation, promotion of alternative transportation methods, and public engagement, cities can work towards a future where cars are no longer the dominant mode of transportation. Car-free cities offer a promising vision of a more sustainable and vibrant urban environment.\n",
- "#2:\n",
- "Car Free Cities Car-free cities, a concept gaining traction in contemporary urban planning, seek to transform the way we live, commute, and interact with our surroundings. These cities envision a future where private automobiles are either severely restricted or completely eliminated from urban landscapes, making room for alternative modes of transportation, green spaces, and sustainable living. In this essay, we will explore the various aspects of car-free cities, including their benefits, challenges, and potential solutions. The idea of car-free cities stems from a growing awareness of the negative consequences of car-centric urban planning. Congestion, air pollution, and the diminishing quality of life in crowded, noisy, and car-infested streets have prompted urban planners to seek alternatives. Car-free cities offer several advantages: Environmental Sustainability: By reducing the number of vehicles on the road, car-free cities significantly decrease air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This step towards environmental sustainability helps combat climate change and fosters cleaner, healthier urban environments. Public Health: Fewer cars on the road mean fewer accidents and a safer environment for pedestrians and cyclists. Additionally, the reduction in air pollution results in improved respiratory and cardiovascular health for city dwellers. Efficient Space Utilization: Car-free cities optimize urban space usage. Parking lots and wide roads can be repurposed for parks, green spaces, and pedestrian zones, enhancing the overall quality of life. Reduced Traffic Congestion: Less reliance on private cars leads to reduced traffic congestion, shorter commute times, and less stress for residents and commuters. Cost Savings: Owning and maintaining a car can be expensive. Car-free cities allow residents to save money on vehicle purchase, fuel, and insurance, thereby improving their financial well-being. However, transitioning to car-free cities presents its own set of challenges: Resistance to Change: Many people heavily rely on their cars for daily activities and commutes. Transitioning to car-free living can face resistance from those who fear the loss of convenience and autonomy. Public Transportation Infrastructure: Effective public transportation systems are critical for the success of car-free cities. Investments and improvements in public transit are necessary to provide convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that rely on car-dependent customers may experience declining revenue. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses during the transition is essential. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: Redesigning urban areas for car-free living demands comprehensive planning and substantial investment in infrastructure, which can be a complex and lengthy process. Solutions for the successful implementation of car-free cities include expanding public transportation, promoting active transportation, encouraging carpooling and ride-sharing, adopting electric and sustainable transportation, and focusing on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities represent a promising vision for a more sustainable and healthy urban future. While challenges exist, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make it a compelling goal. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and involving the public in the planning process, cities can work toward a future where cars are no longer the dominant mode of transportation. Car-free cities offer a promising vision of a more sustainable and vibrant urban environment.\n",
- "#3:\n",
- " A Sustainable Urban Future Car-free cities are emerging as a powerful response to the pressing challenges of urbanization. These cities aspire to create environments where private automobiles are either severely restricted or completely banned, emphasizing sustainable transportation alternatives, cleaner air, and vibrant urban living. This essay delves into the concept of car-free cities, exploring their potential benefits, challenges, and solutions. Car-free cities are gaining momentum as a solution to pressing urban challenges. These cities aim to create environments where private automobiles are either restricted or entirely eliminated in favor of sustainable transportation alternatives. This essay explores the concept of car-free cities, emphasizing their potential benefits, challenges, and solutions. Car-free cities represent a vision for urban living that emphasizes sustainability, health, and efficiency: Environmental Sustainability: A reduced reliance on cars leads to decreased air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This shift towards environmental sustainability helps mitigate climate change and promotes cleaner, healthier cities. Public Health: Car-free cities create safer environments for pedestrians and cyclists. Reduced air pollution levels contribute to better respiratory and cardiovascular health, enhancing overall public well-being. Optimal Space Utilization: Car-free cities make efficient use of urban space. Parking lots and wide roads can be repurposed into green spaces, parks, and pedestrian zones, enhancing the quality of life. Traffic Congestion Reduction: Fewer private cars on the road result in less traffic congestion, shorter commutes, and lower stress levels for city residents and commuters. Economic Savings: Car ownership can be expensive, including vehicle purchase, fuel, and insurance. Car-free cities offer residents an opportunity to save money and improve their financial stability. Despite their potential, transitioning to car-free cities is not without its challenges: Resistance to Change: Many individuals rely heavily on cars for daily activities and commutes. The shift to car-free living can face resistance from those who fear inconvenience and a loss of personal autonomy. Public Transportation Infrastructure: A robust public transportation system is vital for the success of car-free cities. Investments in public transit and its expansion are crucial to provide convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that depend on car-dependent customers may experience revenue declines during the transition. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses is essential. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: Redesigning urban areas for car-free living requires comprehensive planning and substantial infrastructure investments, which can be complex and time-consuming. Solutions for the successful adoption of car-free cities include expanding public transportation networks, promoting active transportation such as walking and cycling, encouraging carpooling and ride-sharing, adopting electric and sustainable transportation options, and focusing on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities present a promising vision for a more sustainable and healthy urban future. While they come with challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make them a compelling objective. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and involving the public in the planning process, cities can work towards a future where private cars no longer dominate the urban landscape. Car-free cities offer a hopeful glimpse of a more sustainable and vibrant urban environment.\n",
- "#4:\n",
- " Pioneering Sustainable Urban Living In an era marked by rapid urbanization, car-free cities have emerged as a visionary solution to the many challenges that densely populated urban areas face. The concept of car-free cities envisions a future where private automobiles are either restricted or entirely absent, making way for sustainable transportation alternatives and green, people-centered urban spaces. This essay delves into the idea of car-free cities, exploring their potential benefits, challenges, and solutions. Car-free cities are a response to the urgent need for sustainable urban living: Environmental Sustainability: The reduced use of cars significantly lowers air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to a healthier planet. These cities serve as beacons of environmental responsibility in an era where climate change is a pressing concern. Public Health: Car-free cities prioritize pedestrian and cyclist safety, resulting in fewer accidents and better health outcomes. Decreased air pollution levels lead to improved respiratory and cardiovascular health among residents. Optimal Space Utilization: These cities make efficient use of urban space by repurposing parking lots and roads into parks, green spaces, and pedestrian zones. The urban landscape is transformed into an inviting and vibrant place to live. Traffic Congestion Reduction: With fewer private cars on the road, traffic congestion is greatly reduced, resulting in shorter commutes and less stress for city dwellers. Economic Benefits: Car ownership can be a costly endeavor. By reducing their reliance on private vehicles, residents in car-free cities have the opportunity to save money on vehicle-related expenses, improving their overall financial stability. However, the transition to car-free cities presents a unique set of challenges: Resistance to Change: Many individuals depend heavily on their cars for daily routines and commutes, and the transition to car-free living may face resistance from those who fear the loss of convenience and personal freedom. Public Transportation Infrastructure: Effective public transportation systems are crucial for the success of car-free cities. Substantial investments are needed to expand and enhance public transit options, providing convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses relying on car-dependent customers may experience declining revenues during the transition. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses is a critical aspect of the transition. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: The redesign of urban areas for car-free living demands comprehensive planning and significant investments in infrastructure, which can be a complex and time-consuming process. Solutions to successfully implement car-free cities include the expansion and improvement of public transportation, the promotion of active transportation methods such as walking and cycling, the encouragement of carpooling and ride-sharing, the adoption of electric and sustainable transportation, and a focus on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities offer a glimpse into a more sustainable and vibrant urban future. Despite the challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make them a compelling goal. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and involving the public in the planning process, cities can work towards a future where private cars are no longer the dominant mode of transportation. Car-free cities represent an inspiring vision of a more sustainable and people-centric urban environment.\n",
- "#5:\n",
- " The Path to Sustainable Urban Living In an age of rapid urbanization, the concept of car-free cities is gaining momentum as a visionary solution to the complex challenges posed by urban areas. Car-free cities are urban environments where private automobiles are either heavily restricted or completely prohibited, promoting the use of sustainable transportation alternatives and fostering a healthier, more vibrant urban lifestyle. This essay explores the concept of car-free cities, examining the potential benefits, challenges, and strategies for their successful implementation. Car-free cities offer a vision of urban living focused on sustainability and well-being: Environmental Sustainability: By significantly reducing the number of cars on the road, car-free cities contribute to cleaner air and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, thus playing a vital role in mitigating climate change. Public Health: These cities prioritize pedestrian and cyclist safety, leading to fewer accidents and enhanced public health. Reduced air pollution levels result in better respiratory and cardiovascular health for urban residents. Optimal Use of Space: Car-free cities make efficient use of urban space by converting parking lots and wide roads into green areas, parks, and pedestrian zones. This transformation enriches the overall urban landscape and quality of life. Traffic Congestion Reduction: Fewer private cars on the road mean less traffic congestion, shorter commute times, and a less stressful daily life for urban inhabitants. Economic Benefits: Car ownership can be costly. By relying less on private vehicles, residents of car-free cities have the opportunity to save money on car-related expenses, which can contribute to improved financial stability. Transitioning to car-free cities, however, poses unique challenges: Resistance to Change: Many individuals heavily rely on their cars for daily activities and commutes, leading to potential resistance to the transition to car-free living due to fears of inconvenience and a loss of autonomy. Public Transportation Infrastructure: A robust public transportation system is essential for the success of car-free cities. Substantial investments are needed to expand and enhance public transit options, providing convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that depend on car-dependent customers may face a decline in revenue during the transition. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses is a crucial aspect of the transition. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: The reconfiguration of urban areas for car-free living requires comprehensive planning and significant investments in infrastructure, a complex and time-consuming process. To realize car-free cities successfully, strategies include expanding and enhancing public transportation, promoting active transportation methods like walking and cycling, encouraging carpooling and ride-sharing, adopting electric and sustainable transportation, and focusing on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities offer an inspiring vision of a more sustainable and vibrant urban future. Despite the challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make them a compelling goal. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and engaging the public in the planning process, cities can work toward a future where private cars are no longer the dominant mode of transportation. Car-free cities represent a promising glimpse of a more sustainable and people-centric urban environment.\n",
- "#6:\n",
- " A Paradigm Shift in Urban Living In an era marked by increasing urbanization and environmental concerns, the concept of car-free cities is gaining momentum as a transformative solution to the complex challenges faced by metropolitan areas. Car-free cities are urban environments that prioritize sustainable transportation alternatives over private automobiles, aiming to create cleaner, healthier, and more vibrant urban spaces. This essay explores the concept of car-free cities, highlighting their potential benefits, challenges, and strategies for successful implementation. Car-free cities embody a vision of urban living that champions sustainability and community well-being: Environmental Sustainability: By reducing the number of cars on the road, car-free cities play a significant role in reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This environmentally responsible approach is essential in addressing the urgent issue of climate change. Public Health: The emphasis on pedestrian and cyclist safety in car-free cities results in fewer accidents and improved public health. Decreased air pollution levels lead to better respiratory and cardiovascular health for residents. Optimal Use of Urban Space: Car-free cities efficiently repurpose urban space, transforming parking lots and wide roads into green parks, recreational areas, and pedestrian zones. This revitalizes the urban landscape and enhances the overall quality of life. Traffic Congestion Reduction: With fewer private cars on the road, traffic congestion is significantly diminished, leading to shorter commutes and a less stressful daily urban experience. Economic Benefits: Car ownership can be a costly endeavor. In car-free cities, residents have the opportunity to save money on car-related expenses, improving their financial stability. However, the transition to car-free cities is not without its share of challenges: Resistance to Change: Many individuals rely heavily on their cars for daily activities and commutes, leading to potential resistance to the transition due to concerns about convenience and a perceived loss of personal freedom. Public Transportation Infrastructure: The success of car-free cities hinges on the availability and efficiency of public transportation. Substantial investments are required to expand and enhance public transit systems, offering convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that depend on car-dependent customers may experience declining revenues during the transition. Addressing this economic impact and providing support to affected businesses is a crucial aspect of the transition. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: Redesigning urban areas for car-free living demands thorough planning and substantial investments in infrastructure, a complex and time-consuming process. To successfully realize car-free cities, strategies include expanding and improving public transportation, promoting active transportation modes such as walking and cycling, encouraging carpooling and ride-sharing, adopting electric and sustainable transportation options, and prioritizing public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities offer a compelling vision of a more sustainable and community-centric urban future. Despite the challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make them a worthy goal. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and engaging the public in the planning process, cities can work toward a future where private cars no longer dominate the urban landscape. Car-free cities represent a promising glimpse of a more sustainable and people-centric urban environment.\n",
"\n",
- "Given these, can you describe the differences between the two types of writers?\n"
+ "AI #2:\n",
+ "Car Free Cities Car-free cities, a concept gaining traction in contemporary urban planning, seek to transform the way we live, commute, and interact with our surroundings. These cities envision a future where private automobiles are either severely restricted or completely eliminated from urban landscapes, making room for alternative modes of transportation, green spaces, and sustainable living. In this essay, we will explore the various aspects of car-free cities, including their benefits, challenges, and potential solutions. The idea of car-free cities stems from a growing awareness of the negative consequences of car-centric urban planning. Congestion, air pollution, and the diminishing quality of life in crowded, noisy, and car-infested streets have prompted urban planners to seek alternatives. Car-free cities offer several advantages: Environmental Sustainability: By reducing the number of vehicles on the road, car-free cities significantly decrease air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This step towards environmental sustainability helps combat climate change and fosters cleaner, healthier urban environments. Public Health: Fewer cars on the road mean fewer accidents and a safer environment for pedestrians and cyclists. Additionally, the reduction in air pollution results in improved respiratory and cardiovascular health for city dwellers. Efficient Space Utilization: Car-free cities optimize urban space usage. Parking lots and wide roads can be repurposed for parks, green spaces, and pedestrian zones, enhancing the overall quality of life. Reduced Traffic Congestion: Less reliance on private cars leads to reduced traffic congestion, shorter commute times, and less stress for residents and commuters. Cost Savings: Owning and maintaining a car can be expensive. Car-free cities allow residents to save money on vehicle purchase, fuel, and insurance, thereby improving their financial well-being. However, transitioning to car-free cities presents its own set of challenges: Resistance to Change: Many people heavily rely on their cars for daily activities and commutes. Transitioning to car-free living can face resistance from those who fear the loss of convenience and autonomy. Public Transportation Infrastructure: Effective public transportation systems are critical for the success of car-free cities. Investments and improvements in public transit are necessary to provide convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that rely on car-dependent customers may experience declining revenue. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses during the transition is essential. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: Redesigning urban areas for car-free living demands comprehensive planning and substantial investment in infrastructure, which can be a complex and lengthy process. Solutions for the successful implementation of car-free cities include expanding public transportation, promoting active transportation, encouraging carpooling and ride-sharing, adopting electric and sustainable transportation, and focusing on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities represent a promising vision for a more sustainable and healthy urban future. While challenges exist, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make it a compelling goal. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and involving the public in the planning process, cities can work toward a future where cars are no longer the dominant mode of transportation. Car-free cities offer a promising vision of a more sustainable and vibrant urban environment.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "AI #3:\n",
+ " A Sustainable Urban Future Car-free cities are emerging as a powerful response to the pressing challenges of urbanization. These cities aspire to create environments where private automobiles are either severely restricted or completely banned, emphasizing sustainable transportation alternatives, cleaner air, and vibrant urban living. This essay delves into the concept of car-free cities, exploring their potential benefits, challenges, and solutions. Car-free cities are gaining momentum as a solution to pressing urban challenges. These cities aim to create environments where private automobiles are either restricted or entirely eliminated in favor of sustainable transportation alternatives. This essay explores the concept of car-free cities, emphasizing their potential benefits, challenges, and solutions. Car-free cities represent a vision for urban living that emphasizes sustainability, health, and efficiency: Environmental Sustainability: A reduced reliance on cars leads to decreased air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This shift towards environmental sustainability helps mitigate climate change and promotes cleaner, healthier cities. Public Health: Car-free cities create safer environments for pedestrians and cyclists. Reduced air pollution levels contribute to better respiratory and cardiovascular health, enhancing overall public well-being. Optimal Space Utilization: Car-free cities make efficient use of urban space. Parking lots and wide roads can be repurposed into green spaces, parks, and pedestrian zones, enhancing the quality of life. Traffic Congestion Reduction: Fewer private cars on the road result in less traffic congestion, shorter commutes, and lower stress levels for city residents and commuters. Economic Savings: Car ownership can be expensive, including vehicle purchase, fuel, and insurance. Car-free cities offer residents an opportunity to save money and improve their financial stability. Despite their potential, transitioning to car-free cities is not without its challenges: Resistance to Change: Many individuals rely heavily on cars for daily activities and commutes. The shift to car-free living can face resistance from those who fear inconvenience and a loss of personal autonomy. Public Transportation Infrastructure: A robust public transportation system is vital for the success of car-free cities. Investments in public transit and its expansion are crucial to provide convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that depend on car-dependent customers may experience revenue declines during the transition. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses is essential. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: Redesigning urban areas for car-free living requires comprehensive planning and substantial infrastructure investments, which can be complex and time-consuming. Solutions for the successful adoption of car-free cities include expanding public transportation networks, promoting active transportation such as walking and cycling, encouraging carpooling and ride-sharing, adopting electric and sustainable transportation options, and focusing on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities present a promising vision for a more sustainable and healthy urban future. While they come with challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make them a compelling objective. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and involving the public in the planning process, cities can work towards a future where private cars no longer dominate the urban landscape. Car-free cities offer a hopeful glimpse of a more sustainable and vibrant urban environment.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "AI #4:\n",
+ " Pioneering Sustainable Urban Living In an era marked by rapid urbanization, car-free cities have emerged as a visionary solution to the many challenges that densely populated urban areas face. The concept of car-free cities envisions a future where private automobiles are either restricted or entirely absent, making way for sustainable transportation alternatives and green, people-centered urban spaces. This essay delves into the idea of car-free cities, exploring their potential benefits, challenges, and solutions. Car-free cities are a response to the urgent need for sustainable urban living: Environmental Sustainability: The reduced use of cars significantly lowers air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to a healthier planet. These cities serve as beacons of environmental responsibility in an era where climate change is a pressing concern. Public Health: Car-free cities prioritize pedestrian and cyclist safety, resulting in fewer accidents and better health outcomes. Decreased air pollution levels lead to improved respiratory and cardiovascular health among residents. Optimal Space Utilization: These cities make efficient use of urban space by repurposing parking lots and roads into parks, green spaces, and pedestrian zones. The urban landscape is transformed into an inviting and vibrant place to live. Traffic Congestion Reduction: With fewer private cars on the road, traffic congestion is greatly reduced, resulting in shorter commutes and less stress for city dwellers. Economic Benefits: Car ownership can be a costly endeavor. By reducing their reliance on private vehicles, residents in car-free cities have the opportunity to save money on vehicle-related expenses, improving their overall financial stability. However, the transition to car-free cities presents a unique set of challenges: Resistance to Change: Many individuals depend heavily on their cars for daily routines and commutes, and the transition to car-free living may face resistance from those who fear the loss of convenience and personal freedom. Public Transportation Infrastructure: Effective public transportation systems are crucial for the success of car-free cities. Substantial investments are needed to expand and enhance public transit options, providing convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses relying on car-dependent customers may experience declining revenues during the transition. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses is a critical aspect of the transition. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: The redesign of urban areas for car-free living demands comprehensive planning and significant investments in infrastructure, which can be a complex and time-consuming process. Solutions to successfully implement car-free cities include the expansion and improvement of public transportation, the promotion of active transportation methods such as walking and cycling, the encouragement of carpooling and ride-sharing, the adoption of electric and sustainable transportation, and a focus on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities offer a glimpse into a more sustainable and vibrant urban future. Despite the challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make them a compelling goal. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and involving the public in the planning process, cities can work towards a future where private cars are no longer the dominant mode of transportation. Car-free cities represent an inspiring vision of a more sustainable and people-centric urban environment.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "AI #5:\n",
+ " The Path to Sustainable Urban Living In an age of rapid urbanization, the concept of car-free cities is gaining momentum as a visionary solution to the complex challenges posed by urban areas. Car-free cities are urban environments where private automobiles are either heavily restricted or completely prohibited, promoting the use of sustainable transportation alternatives and fostering a healthier, more vibrant urban lifestyle. This essay explores the concept of car-free cities, examining the potential benefits, challenges, and strategies for their successful implementation. Car-free cities offer a vision of urban living focused on sustainability and well-being: Environmental Sustainability: By significantly reducing the number of cars on the road, car-free cities contribute to cleaner air and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, thus playing a vital role in mitigating climate change. Public Health: These cities prioritize pedestrian and cyclist safety, leading to fewer accidents and enhanced public health. Reduced air pollution levels result in better respiratory and cardiovascular health for urban residents. Optimal Use of Space: Car-free cities make efficient use of urban space by converting parking lots and wide roads into green areas, parks, and pedestrian zones. This transformation enriches the overall urban landscape and quality of life. Traffic Congestion Reduction: Fewer private cars on the road mean less traffic congestion, shorter commute times, and a less stressful daily life for urban inhabitants. Economic Benefits: Car ownership can be costly. By relying less on private vehicles, residents of car-free cities have the opportunity to save money on car-related expenses, which can contribute to improved financial stability. Transitioning to car-free cities, however, poses unique challenges: Resistance to Change: Many individuals heavily rely on their cars for daily activities and commutes, leading to potential resistance to the transition to car-free living due to fears of inconvenience and a loss of autonomy. Public Transportation Infrastructure: A robust public transportation system is essential for the success of car-free cities. Substantial investments are needed to expand and enhance public transit options, providing convenient alternatives to private cars. Economic Impact: Businesses that depend on car-dependent customers may face a decline in revenue during the transition. Addressing this economic impact and supporting affected businesses is a crucial aspect of the transition. Urban Planning and Infrastructure: The reconfiguration of urban areas for car-free living requires comprehensive planning and significant investments in infrastructure, a complex and time-consuming process. To realize car-free cities successfully, strategies include expanding and enhancing public transportation, promoting active transportation methods like walking and cycling, encouraging carpooling and ride-sharing, adopting electric and sustainable transportation, and focusing on public education and awareness. In conclusion, car-free cities offer an inspiring vision of a more sustainable and vibrant urban future. Despite the challenges, the potential benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, public health, efficient urban living, and cost savings make them a compelling goal. By investing in public transportation, promoting alternative transportation methods, and engaging the public in the planning process, cities can work toward a future where private cars are no longer the dominant mode of transportation. Car-free cities represent a promising glimpse of a more sustainable and people-centric urban environment.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "\n",
+ "Given these, can you describe the differences between the human and AI writers?\n"
]
}
],
@@ -682,10 +854,8 @@
" PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] = PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] + \"\\n\";\n",
"\n",
" for GENERATION_TYPE in STRINGS.keys(): \n",
- " PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] = PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] + GENERATION_TYPE + \":\\n\";\n",
- "\n",
- " for TEXT_NUMBER in range(6): \n",
- " PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] = PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] + ':\\n'.join([\"#\" + str(TEXT_NUMBER + 1), STRINGS[GENERATION_TYPE][\"training\"][TEXT_NUMBER]]) + \"\\n\";\n",
+ " for TEXT_NUMBER in range(len(STRINGS[GENERATION_TYPE][\"training\"])): \n",
+ " PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] = PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] + ':\\n'.join([GENERATION_TYPE + \" #\" + str(TEXT_NUMBER + 1), STRINGS[GENERATION_TYPE][\"training\"][TEXT_NUMBER]]) + \"\\n\\n\";\n",
"\n",
" PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] = PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"] + \"\\n\" + PROMPTS[\"raw\"][\"descriptions\"][1]\n",
"\n",
@@ -699,125 +869,128 @@
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
- "Google Gemini will first be asked due to differences in API structure. "
+ "The large language models are tested below. "
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 20,
- "metadata": {},
- "outputs": [],
- "source": [
- "if (not(\"description\" in RESULTS.keys())): \n",
- " RESULTS[\"description\"] = {};\n",
- "\n",
- "RESULTS[\"description\"][\"gemini-1.5-pro\"] = MODELS[\"gemini-1.5-pro\"].generate_content(PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"]);"
- ]
- },
- {
- "cell_type": "markdown",
- "metadata": {},
- "source": [
- "Next, Llama and Phi would be used. "
- ]
- },
- {
- "cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 22,
+ "execution_count": 42,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [
{
- "name": "stdout",
- "output_type": "stream",
- "text": [
- "llama3.1 has completed its response.\n",
- "phi3:latest has completed its response.\n"
- ]
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
}
],
"source": [
"def description_overview_ask(): \n",
" if (not(\"description\" in RESULTS.keys())): \n",
- " RESULTS[\"description\"] = {};\n",
+ " RESULTS[\"description\"] = {}\n",
"\n",
- " for MODEL_NAME in [\"llama3.1\",\"phi3:latest\"]: \n",
- " RESULTS[\"description\"][MODEL_NAME] = ollama.generate(MODEL_NAME, prompt=PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"]);\n",
- " print(' '.join([MODEL_NAME, 'has completed its response.']));\n",
+ " STATUS = display(\"\", display_id=True);\n",
+ "\n",
+ " for MODEL_INDEX in range(len(MODELS)): \n",
+ " MODEL_NAME = MODELS[MODEL_INDEX];\n",
+ "\n",
+ " # Update the status.\n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(''.join([\" \"])));\n",
+ "\n",
+ " RESPONSE = ollama.generate(model=MODEL_NAME, prompt=PROMPTS[\"descriptions\"]);\n",
+ " RESULTS[\"description\"][MODEL_NAME] = RESPONSE;\n",
+ " \n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(''.join([\" \"])));\n",
+ " \n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(\" \"));\n",
+ "\n",
+ " return RESULTS[\"description\"]\n",
"\n",
- " return (RESULTS[\"description\"]);\n",
"description_overview_ask();"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 24,
+ "execution_count": 43,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [
{
- "name": "stdout",
- "output_type": "stream",
- "text": [
- "gemini-1.5-pro: \n",
- "\tThe human-written texts and the AI-generated texts exhibit several key differences:\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**Human Texts:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t* **More Varied Structure and Style:** Human writers tend to have a more diverse and less predictable writing style. They might use more informal language, personal anecdotes, or varied sentence structures. The human examples show more variation in tone, structure, and argumentation style.\n",
- "\t* **More Specific Examples and Evidence:** Humans often draw on specific examples and evidence from their own experiences or knowledge. While they cite articles in these examples, they often go beyond the immediate information and connect it to broader concepts.\n",
- "\t* **More Pronounced Personal Voice:** Human writing often reveals the writer's personality and perspective more clearly. This can be seen in their choice of words, the tone they adopt, and the way they frame their arguments.\n",
- "\t* **Potential for Errors and Inconsistencies:** Humans are more prone to making grammatical errors, typos, or inconsistencies in their arguments. This can be seen in some of the human-written texts, particularly #5.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**AI Texts:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t* **Formulaic and Repetitive Structure:** AI writing tends to follow a more predictable and formulaic structure, often relying on a consistent format for paragraphs and arguments. The structure is very similar across all six AI-generated examples.\n",
- "\t* **General and Abstract Language:** AI often uses more general and abstract language, lacking the specific examples and personal touches that often characterize human writing. They provide overviews but lack the depth of specific, real-world examples.\n",
- "\t* **Neutral and Objective Tone:** AI aims for a neutral and objective tone, avoiding personal opinions or subjective statements. There's a lack of personality or individual voice.\n",
- "\t* **Grammatically Correct and Consistent:** AI is generally very good at producing grammatically correct and consistent text. They lack the errors that can sometimes be found in human writing.\n",
- "\t* **Potential for Shallowness and Lack of Originality:** While AI can produce well-written text, it can sometimes lack depth and originality. The arguments presented can feel generic and lack the insightful connections that human writers often make.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**In Summary:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\tHuman writing is generally characterized by greater variability, personality, and the use of specific examples, while AI writing is typically more formulaic, objective, and grammatically flawless. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. Human writing can be more engaging and insightful, but prone to errors. AI writing is consistently accurate and well-structured, but can lack depth and originality.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\tThis analysis highlights the ongoing evolution of writing in the age of AI, and how important it is to be able to discern the nuances between human and machine-generated text.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "llama3.1: \n",
- "\tBased on the provided texts, I've identified some differences between the two writers:\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**Style:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t* Writer #1 tends to use simpler sentence structures and concise paragraphs. The text is written in a straightforward and easy-to-follow manner.\n",
- "\t* Writer #2 uses more complex sentence structures and longer paragraphs. The text has a more formal tone and is written in a slightly more elaborate style.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**Vocabulary:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t* Writer #1 employs everyday vocabulary, making the text accessible to a wider audience.\n",
- "\t* Writer #2 uses more technical terms and phrases, such as \"paradigm shift,\" \"urban planning and infrastructure,\" and \"sustainable transportation options.\" The text assumes a higher level of prior knowledge or expertise in urban planning and policy.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**Emphasis:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t* Writer #1 emphasizes the benefits of car-free cities, such as improved public health, environmental sustainability, and cost savings. The text presents these advantages as compelling reasons to adopt this approach.\n",
- "\t* Writer #2 also highlights the benefits but devotes more attention to the challenges associated with implementing car-free cities. This writer acknowledges potential resistance to change, economic impacts on businesses, and the need for significant investments in infrastructure.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**Tone:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t* Writer #1 presents a generally positive tone, focusing on the benefits of car-free cities.\n",
- "\t* Writer #2 maintains a slightly more neutral tone, acknowledging both the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. However, the overall tone remains optimistic and encouraging, suggesting that the potential benefits outweigh the challenges.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t**Purpose:**\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\t* Writer #1 seems to be aiming for a broader audience interested in general information about car-free cities.\n",
- "\t* Writer #2 targets readers with some background knowledge or interest in urban planning, policy, and sustainability issues. The text appears to be more geared towards an academic or professional audience.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\tKeep in mind that these differences are based on the limited texts provided and might not accurately represent the writers' overall styles, approaches, or goals.\n",
- "phi3:latest: \n",
- "\tThe first writer provided an informative essay that is primarily factual with clear sections detailing various aspects and benefits of car-free cities along with their implementation strategies. The language used was explanatory in nature to educate readers about this concept, focusing on its potential impacts on sustainability, public health, urban life efficiency and economy without delving into personal opinions or experiences too much except for one sentence suggesting a future perspective which still maintains the essay's focus towards informing rather than persuading.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\tThe second writer also provided an engaging description of car-free cities but with more emphasis on emotional appeals to encourage readers’ acceptance and support for this concept, using expressions like \"an inspiring vision\", “visionary alternative” or phrases related to a compelling goal which aim at persuading the audience. Although there are sections that explain benefits much similar as in the first essay's style (like environmental sustainability), it seems more focused on appealing readers’ emotions and convincing them about why they should support this concept, beyond just informing or providing a factual basis for understanding car-free cities.\n",
- "\t\n",
- "\tHowever, both writers have effectively communicated their messages within the context of advocating for reducing reliance on private cars in urban areas to achieve more sustainable living conditions and maintain good public health while improving traffic flow as well economic aspects tied into this concept which shows they are not entirely different but use a slightly varied approach.\n",
- "\n"
- ]
+ "data": {
+ "text/markdown": [
+ "# phi\n",
+ "The AI writer has provided an essay that covers all aspects of car-free cities while adhering to the given instructions. It is factual and informative in nature with no personal biases or opinions. On the other hand, the human writer's essay is more creative and subjective, presenting a unique perspective on car-free cities. The human writer has included their own interpretation of the benefits and challenges of implementing car-free cities, which provides an added layer of insight for the reader. Additionally, the AI writer does not have the ability to think outside of the box or offer creative solutions that may be necessary when discussing complex topics like urban planning and transportation."
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/markdown": [
+ "# gemma2:2b\n",
+ "Let's break down the differences between the human and AI writing styles in this context:\n",
+ "\n",
+ "**Human Writers:**\n",
+ "\n",
+ "* **Empathy and Nuance:** They write with a deeper understanding of human motivations and emotions. A human writer might explore the personal stories, worries, hopes, or fears surrounding car-free living. \n",
+ "* **Originality and Creativity:** Human writers can use figurative language, vivid descriptions, and unique storytelling to make their points more engaging. They can adapt their style based on the specific audience and desired tone.\n",
+ "* **Critical Thinking and Analysis:** Humans bring an ability to critically analyze information, offer multiple perspectives, consider ethical dilemmas, and draw conclusions based on complex reasoning. \n",
+ "* **Personal Perspective:** Human writers often reflect on experiences or biases that inform their writing, giving it a more authentic feel.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "**AI Writers (like the one generating this response):**\n",
+ "\n",
+ "* **Objectivity and Conciseness:** They aim to be informative and factual, providing clear, straightforward answers based on the data they've been trained on. They often use neutral language and avoid emotional appeals.\n",
+ "* **Pattern Recognition and Data-Driven Language:** AI writers excel at identifying patterns in data (like the structure of the essay) and creating text that aligns with those patterns. \n",
+ "* **Limited Emotional Capacity:** AI cannot experience emotions like humans do, so their writing might lack a personal touch. It's important to remember they don't have lived experiences to draw on. \n",
+ "* **Speed and Efficiency:** AI is great at producing large amounts of text quickly, often using pre-programmed templates or algorithms for speed.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "**Examples from the Texts:**\n",
+ "\n",
+ "* **Human Writer:** \"The transition to car-free cities presents a unique set of challenges: Resistance to Change...\" This shows a human writer's ability to think about and describe complex situations with nuance and emotional context.\n",
+ "* **AI Writer:** \"...and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, thus playing a vital role in mitigating climate change.\" This demonstrates the AI's focus on clear, concise facts and data-driven writing.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "**In Summary**\n",
+ "\n",
+ "While both human and AI writers have their strengths, they bring different approaches to the table. Human writers offer depth and emotional connection while AI excels in objectivity, speed, and efficiency."
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/markdown": [
+ "# tinyllama\n",
+ "The two writers are quite different in terms of their style, tone, and approach to writing. Here's a brief breakdown:\n",
+ "\n",
+ "1. Human writer: This writer is an experienced writer who has written many articles on various topics related to sustainability, environment, and urban planning. Their writing is detailed, informative, and engaging, with plenty of examples and statistics to support their arguments. They use active voice and offer real-world solutions to problems faced by the readers.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "2. AI writer: This writer is a chatbot that uses machine learning algorithms to generate human-like writing styles. The AI writer's writing is concise, factual, and focused on providing readers with quick solutions to their sustainability concerns. They write in a conversational tone and use anecdotes to illustrate their points. While the AI writer can be helpful for addressing immediate concerns related to sustainability, it lacks depth and nuance, making it difficult to understand the broader implications of these issues.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "In terms of style and tone, the AI writer may feel distant or robotic at times due to its use of machine learning algorithms. However, the human writer's writing can be quite dry and lacking in enthusiasm, which could make it difficult for readers to fully engage with their ideas. The AI writer's conversational style can help to bridge this gap by making complex concepts more accessible to a broader audience.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "In terms of approaches to writing, the human writer is focused on providing solutions to specific sustainability problems faced by the reader, whereas the AI writer focuses on generalizations and quick fixes for common sustainability concerns. While both writers have valuable insights, their approaches may be more effective depending on the particular issue or topic being discussed.\n",
+ "\n",
+ "Overall, while the AI writer's writing style can be helpful in addressing immediate concerns related to sustainability, its lack of depth and nuance could make it difficult for readers to understand the broader implications of these issues. In contrast, the human writer's focus on providing solutions specific to the reader's problem or issue may help to bridge this gap."
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
}
],
"source": [
@@ -825,21 +998,152 @@
" TEXT_OUTPUT = \"\";\n",
"\n",
" for MODEL_NAME in (RESULTS[\"description\"].keys()): \n",
- " TEXT_OUTPUT = TEXT_OUTPUT + MODEL_NAME + \": \\n\"\n",
+ " display(Markdown(\"# \" + MODEL_NAME + \"\\n\" + RESULTS[\"description\"][MODEL_NAME]['response'].strip()));\n",
"\n",
- " if \"gemini\" in MODEL_NAME: \n",
- " TEXT_OUTPUT = TEXT_OUTPUT + \"\\t\" + \"\\n\\t\".join((RESULTS[\"description\"][MODEL_NAME].text).split(\"\\n\"));\n",
- " else: \n",
- " TEXT_OUTPUT = TEXT_OUTPUT + \"\\t\" + \"\\n\\t\".join(RESULTS[\"description\"][MODEL_NAME]['response'].split(\"\\n\"));\n",
- " \n",
- " TEXT_OUTPUT = TEXT_OUTPUT + \"\\n\";\n",
- "\n",
- " print(TEXT_OUTPUT);\n",
" return(TEXT_OUTPUT); \n",
"\n",
"description_overview_show();"
]
},
+ {
+ "cell_type": "markdown",
+ "metadata": {},
+ "source": [
+ "### Testing Functions"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "markdown",
+ "metadata": {},
+ "source": [
+ "Below are the functions used for testing. "
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": 45,
+ "metadata": {},
+ "outputs": [],
+ "source": [
+ "def perform_test(MODEL_NAME, TEST_TYPE): \n",
+ " # Create a dictionary for the test’s results.\n",
+ " if not(TEST_TYPE in RESULTS.keys()): \n",
+ " RESULTS[TEST_TYPE] = {};\n",
+ "\n",
+ " # Create a dictionary for the model’s results.\n",
+ " RESULTS[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME] = {};\n",
+ "\n",
+ " # Set the status details. \n",
+ "\n",
+ " for AUTHOR in PROMPTS[TEST_TYPE].keys(): \n",
+ " RESULTS[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME][AUTHOR] = [];\n",
+ "\n",
+ " STATUS = display(Markdown(\"Starting next test…\"), display_id=True);\n",
+ "\n",
+ " for STRING_INDEX in range(len(PROMPTS[TEST_TYPE][AUTHOR])): \n",
+ " # Update and display the status.\n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(''.join([\" \"])));\n",
+ " \n",
+ " RESULTS[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME][AUTHOR].append(ollama.generate(MODEL_NAME, prompt=PROMPTS[TEST_TYPE][AUTHOR][STRING_INDEX]));\n",
+ "\n",
+ " # Update the status. \n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(''.join([\" \"])));\n",
+ " \n",
+ " if (len(PROMPTS[TEST_TYPE][AUTHOR]) - 1 == STRING_INDEX): \n",
+ " # Update the status. \n",
+ " STATUS.update(HTML(''.join([\" \"])));\n",
+ "\n",
+ " return(RESULTS[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME]);"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": 60,
+ "metadata": {},
+ "outputs": [],
+ "source": [
+ "ACCURACIES = {}\n",
+ "SUMMARIES = {};\n",
+ "\n",
+ "def analyze_responses(MARKSCHEME, RAW): \n",
+ " CHOICES = [];\n",
+ " ACCURACY = {};\n",
+ "\n",
+ " ACCURACY[\"list\"] = [];\n",
+ " for RAW_DICT in RAW: \n",
+ " # Split each statement to get the last response. \n",
+ " STATEMENT = RAW_DICT['response'];\n",
+ "\n",
+ " # Create a flag for a valid response. \n",
+ " RESPONSE_VALID = False;\n",
+ "\n",
+ " # Loop from the last until the start until a correctly formatted response is detected. \n",
+ " for LINE in STATEMENT.split(\"\\n\"): \n",
+ " if (LINE in PROMPTS[\"raw\"][\"acceptable\"]): \n",
+ " CHOICES.append(LINE);\n",
+ " ACCURACY[\"list\"].append(LINE == MARKSCHEME);\n",
+ " RESPONSE_VALID = True;\n",
+ " break;\n",
+ " \n",
+ " if (not(RESPONSE_VALID)): \n",
+ " CHOICES.append(None);\n",
+ "\n",
+ " # Calculate the accuracy percentage. \n",
+ " ACCURACY[\"ratio\"] = (((Counter(CHOICES))[MARKSCHEME]) / len(RAW));\n",
+ "\n",
+ " return ({\"choices\": CHOICES, \"accuracy\": ACCURACY});\n",
+ "\n",
+ "def check_test(MODEL_NAME, TEST_TYPE): \n",
+ " if (TEST_TYPE in RESULTS.keys()): \n",
+ " # Create a dictionary for the test’s results.\n",
+ " if not(TEST_TYPE in SUMMARIES.keys()): \n",
+ " SUMMARIES[TEST_TYPE] = {};\n",
+ " if not(TEST_TYPE in ACCURACIES.keys()): \n",
+ " ACCURACIES[TEST_TYPE] = {};\n",
+ "\n",
+ " ACCURACIES[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME] = {};\n",
+ " SUMMARIES[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME] = {};\n",
+ "\n",
+ " for AUTHOR in PROMPTS[TEST_TYPE].keys(): \n",
+ " ANALYSIS = analyze_responses(AUTHOR, RESULTS[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME][AUTHOR]);\n",
+ " ACCURACIES[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME][AUTHOR] = ANALYSIS[\"accuracy\"];\n",
+ " SUMMARIES[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME][AUTHOR] = ANALYSIS[\"choices\"];\n",
+ " \n",
+ " return(ACCURACIES[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME]);\n",
+ " else: \n",
+ " return(None);"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": 81,
+ "metadata": {},
+ "outputs": [],
+ "source": [
+ "def display_results(MODEL_NAME, TEST_TYPE): \n",
+ " TEXT_DISPLAY = \"\";\n",
+ "\n",
+ " if (TEST_TYPE in ACCURACIES.keys()): \n",
+ " if not(MODEL_NAME): \n",
+ " for MODEL in ACCURACIES[TEST_TYPE].keys(): \n",
+ " MODEL_NAME = MODEL;\n",
+ " \n",
+ " TEXT_DISPLAY = \"
\" + MODEL + \"
\";\n",
+ "\n",
+ " for AUTHOR in ACCURACIES[TEST_TYPE][MODEL].keys(): \n",
+ " TEXT_DISPLAY = ''.join([TEXT_DISPLAY, '
']);\n",
+ "\n",
+ " display(HTML(TEXT_DISPLAY), display_id=True);\n",
+ " else: \n",
+ " for AUTHOR in ACCURACIES[TEST_TYPE][MODEL_NAME].keys(): \n",
+ " display(HTML(''.join([' '])), display_id=True);\n",
+ "\n",
+ " else: \n",
+ " display(HTML(' '.join([\"\"])));\n",
+ " \n",
+ " return (TEXT_DISPLAY);"
+ ]
+ },
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
@@ -863,29 +1167,32 @@
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
- "execution_count": 29,
+ "execution_count": 49,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [
{
- "name": "stdout",
- "output_type": "stream",
- "text": [
- "Processing human text…\n",
- "Finished converting strings marked as human and is ready to be passed.\n",
- "Processing AI text…\n",
- "Finished converting strings marked as AI and is ready to be passed.\n",
- "Below is a selected piece of text:\n",
- "\n",
- "Since remotely times, the manhad look for some way to make his life easier, since primitive hunting weapons, to carriages. The carriages were pulled by horses mostly, and on those times, the most that those animals could do for contamination was pooping but the owners had people to clean for it as well assomeone who took care of it. While the times had change, the transportation media has too as well with the cars which it actually result to be a doble sided bladecontaminating with smog.\n",
- "\n",
- "In Paris the government has banned driving due to smog, the smog has caused a huge impact on this city, giving to it cooler nights and warmer days, many habitats blame Diesel fuel, but it does not matter which fuel you would use, it would burn and produce smog anyways. On the other hand,Vauban, Germany, is offering a new life style that many people has decided to adopt the suburbian community has no cars at the streets, people there does not own a carbecause they do not need it, the public transportation works very well, so it is not a primary need. They can live perfectlywithout cars, then they are not that necessary. Many people even sell their cars in order to move to Vauban, and had said that their lifes are so much less stressful than when they did own a car. Mothers can let their childrens to play in the streets without thinking that a car is going to kill them, and kids can let go technology if their moms want them to play outside most of the kids are so attached to technology because it is a way that parents have to keep them away from the streets. Maybe these changes like in Germany were too radicals, but it can start by a day a year like in Bogot, Colombia where once a year people take a carfree day, being buses and taxis the only ones allowed to produce smog, the violators are charged with 25 dollars fines. Even in the U.S., from 2003 to 2009 young people driving decreased a 23%, young people are considered the most dangerous driving people. There is so much for young people to do that they are not focused on driving, this could be the beginning of a new era, in April 2013 the number of miles per person was equal that in 1995 where the cars where less than right now. There it is even a program in New York promoting carpooling!\n",
- "\n",
- "But for example, here in Florida the public transportation is not that good, you actually need a car that drives you to the bus station and then take the bus a bus that will let you on a train station, that train station will offer you a ride of an hour to another bus that takes about half an hour to get to your job if you live in Homestead and work in Miami. That is about three hours just arriving to your job, every day for five days in a row that is about thirty hours a week, just to get to your job! But if you have a car, those three hours now are one hour, which seems reasonable and it is still a lot!. If someone lives at Homestead and needs to do something which is generally at downtown Miami or Doral you would have to dedicate a whole day just doing it, if you are going in car because the distance between cities are ridiculous, can you imagine if not having it? For doing something you would have to take two days and do it by parts or wake up at the very morning when it is still dark so you can complete everything by the afternoon. So defenetly the car is a primary need.\n",
- "\n",
- "Analyzing the life style that people at Vauban have, they are less stressed thanthe average personwhoowns a carpeople starts to be more social with their neighbors because they have to walk everywhere and the faces are the same, so they actually get to know each other. They also got the benefit of a cleaner enviroment because they do not have the daily doses of smog that someone living in a city would have cars cause the 12% of the contamination in Europe and more than a 50% in the United States. That is a problem that Paris maybe would not be facing right now if they had payed attention to contamination levels.Since World War II, science has been centered on developing new and better cars can you imagine what would we have right now if some other would center the science in medicicne or something else?. In the United States an 80% of the budget goes to highways while just a 20% goes to public transportation. But, how can people in Bogot or Vauben survive without cars? The distance between the comercial and suburban areas are close enough so a bus could take you there just one bus. Defenetly, making the change would be hard due to our attachment to our cars, but little by little we can change or life style.\n",
- "\n",
- "Now, can you determine if the above piece of text is written by a human or by a large language model? Your answer must always end with your verdict that is either “human” or “AI” in a new line. \n"
- ]
+ "data": {
+ "text/markdown": [
+ "Finished processing human text."
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/markdown": [
+ "Finished processing AI text."
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
}
],
"source": [
@@ -894,19 +1201,159 @@
" PROMPTS[\"blind classify\"] = {}; \n",
" \n",
" for GENERATION_TYPE in STRINGS.keys(): \n",
- " print(' '.join([\"Processing\", GENERATION_TYPE, \"text…\"]))\n",
+ " STATUS = display(Markdown(' '.join([\"Processing\", GENERATION_TYPE, \"text…\"])), display_id=True);\n",
"\n",
" PROMPTS[\"blind classify\"][GENERATION_TYPE] = [];\n",
" \n",
" for STRING in STRINGS[GENERATION_TYPE][\"testing\"]: \n",
" PROMPTS[\"blind classify\"][GENERATION_TYPE].append('\\n\\n'.join([PROMPTS[\"raw\"][\"introduction\"], STRING, ' '.join([PROMPTS[\"raw\"][\"classify\"], PROMPTS[\"raw\"][\"answer format\"]])]));\n",
" \n",
- " print(' '.join([\"Finished converting strings marked as\", GENERATION_TYPE, \"and is ready to be passed.\"]))\n",
+ " STATUS.update(Markdown(' '.join([\"Finished processing\", GENERATION_TYPE, \"text.\"])));\n",
"\n",
" return (PROMPTS[\"blind classify\"]);\n",
"\n",
- "prompts_blind_test_format();\n",
- "print(PROMPTS[\"blind classify\"][\"human\"][0]);"
+ "prompts_blind_test_format();"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": 78,
+ "metadata": {},
+ "outputs": [
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ " "
+ ],
+ "text/plain": [
+ ""
+ ]
+ },
+ "metadata": {},
+ "output_type": "display_data"
+ }
+ ],
+ "source": [
+ "for MODEL in MODELS: \n",
+ " perform_test(MODEL, \"blind classify\");\n"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "code",
+ "execution_count": 84,
+ "metadata": {},
+ "outputs": [
+ {
+ "name": "stdout",
+ "output_type": "stream",
+ "text": [
+ "{'model': 'phi', 'created_at': '2024-08-30T15:05:48.990768Z', 'response': ' AI\\n', 'done': True, 'done_reason': 'stop', 'context': [11964, 25, 317, 8537, 1022, 257, 11040, 2836, 290, 281, 11666, 4430, 8796, 13, 383, 8796, 3607, 7613, 7429, 284, 262, 2836, 6, 82, 2683, 13, 198, 12982, 25, 10383, 318, 257, 6163, 3704, 286, 2420, 25, 198, 198, 20266, 5891, 4290, 286, 2253, 340, 468, 1282, 284, 616, 3241, 326, 12231, 287, 262, 1578, 1829, 318, 1972, 4785, 523, 314, 423, 257, 4610, 779, 5006, 1342, 13, 632, 318, 2829, 11, 428, 481, 1037, 2005, 12231, 287, 262, 471, 13, 50, 355, 262, 1218, 4094, 3278, 15129, 5766, 318, 3750, 290, 460, 1682, 1037, 345, 351, 257, 1365, 1919, 1204, 355, 880, 355, 5742, 17884, 262, 2055, 13, 198, 198, 1722, 4750, 2961, 11, 37993, 389, 262, 1218, 3756, 2728, 286, 12231, 287, 262, 471, 13, 50, 290, 7720, 326, 481, 1037, 2245, 617, 12231, 416, 12225, 530, 286, 262, 4094, 5640, 13, 22025, 2105, 262, 779, 286, 5006, 481, 2005, 262, 6588, 287, 262, 1633, 290, 428, 287, 1210, 460, 1085, 284, 257, 22841, 12263, 355, 880, 13, 1318, 389, 867, 14287, 326, 389, 1097, 1203, 290, 356, 423, 2722, 922, 2482, 422, 531, 14287, 355, 880, 355, 1097, 1479, 1110, 318, 5033, 257, 2277, 287, 9309, 355, 880, 355, 584, 3354, 287, 4318, 2253, 13, 770, 481, 635, 787, 895, 519, 257, 1342, 1884, 19810, 355, 645, 1097, 47301, 389, 1972, 13640, 4361, 11, 21723, 11, 8593, 692, 7241, 1633, 13, 770, 481, 1037, 2948, 262, 976, 12231, 2974, 588, 287, 6342, 1461, 510, 994, 13, 198, 198, 32, 1204, 1231, 5006, 460, 635, 19888, 2689, 262, 1919, 3160, 286, 867, 661, 13, 1081, 661, 389, 517, 1884, 284, 655, 2513, 290, 1561, 351, 2460, 393, 655, 2513, 393, 7161, 284, 262, 3952, 13, 661, 287, 1097, 1203, 2055, 588, 17668, 549, 272, 423, 772, 531, 484, 1254, 1342, 5503, 783, 326, 484, 836, 6, 83, 423, 5006, 13, 6960, 3399, 423, 772, 2067, 6078, 5353, 287, 5006, 290, 561, 2138, 1011, 1171, 4839, 393, 1097, 7742, 351, 2460, 788, 655, 1011, 511, 898, 1097, 13, 843, 355, 257, 1255, 389, 28619, 351, 511, 2460, 290, 1641, 788, 878, 13, 198, 198, 8061, 508, 779, 5006, 329, 4839, 389, 1342, 1884, 284, 779, 262, 24058, 393, 6594, 511, 7161, 290, 355, 257, 1255, 38282, 290, 7161, 13532, 389, 30690, 290, 374, 14655, 13, 8447, 1231, 5006, 11, 1243, 588, 595, 49932, 38282, 393, 9725, 561, 1282, 284, 674, 3241, 13, 1114, 1672, 1879, 3232, 3596, 287, 9309, 2957, 284, 262, 9185, 286, 38282, 290, 220, 16817, 4608, 286, 7161, 9725, 290, 517, 6332, 10399, 14860, 290, 9735, 12815, 423, 2067, 284, 1461, 510, 13, 18067, 5755, 286, 5006, 460, 1037, 514, 17884, 262, 2055, 351, 517, 14860, 290, 1171, 10399, 290, 8181, 5269, 13, 770, 481, 635, 1085, 284, 1365, 2324, 355, 1342, 661, 481, 651, 2277, 416, 5006, 11, 1342, 1097, 17390, 290, 4045, 1365, 2324, 13, 198, 198, 818, 7664, 616, 5891, 4290, 11, 3387, 2074, 787, 278, 428, 2055, 1097, 1203, 13, 329, 511, 389, 867, 13391, 329, 1804, 523, 287, 428, 2055, 422, 262, 17365, 343, 296, 2470, 11, 284, 262, 1919, 290, 284, 262, 1535, 4034, 13, 198, 198, 3844, 11, 460, 345, 5004, 611, 262, 2029, 3704, 286, 2420, 318, 3194, 416, 257, 1692, 393, 416, 257, 1588, 3303, 2746, 30, 3406, 3280, 1276, 1464, 886, 351, 534, 15593, 326, 318, 691, 2035, 220, 447, 250, 10734, 447, 251, 393, 220, 447, 250, 20185, 447, 251, 287, 257, 649, 1627, 355, 484, 389, 11, 1231, 597, 584, 2420, 393, 13386, 13, 220, 198, 48902, 25, 9552, 198], 'total_duration': 2401126416, 'load_duration': 13432000, 'prompt_eval_count': 594, 'prompt_eval_duration': 2322095000, 'eval_count': 3, 'eval_duration': 55841000}\n",
+ "{'model': 'gemma2:2b', 'created_at': '2024-08-30T15:14:42.274449Z', 'response': 'The text exhibits characteristics typical of both AI and human writing:\\n\\n* **Structure:** The piece follows a clear structure (introduction, explanation, supporting arguments, conclusion). This suggests some level of analytical thinking and structuring of ideas. \\n* **Technical Language:** Use of terms like \"second leading cause\", \"carbon in the air\", and \"smog\" indicates a level of understanding of scientific concepts and their application to the context. AI may be able to produce similar language. \\n* **Social Commentary & Observation:** The writer uses specific examples like car-free days in Columbia to support their claims, showing an ability to analyze social phenomena and draw connections between different events. \\n\\n**AI** \\n\\n\\n', 'done': True, 'done_reason': 'stop', 'context': [106, 1645, 108, 33501, 603, 476, 6410, 6431, 576, 2793, 235292, 109, 8666, 11648, 13050, 576, 5783, 665, 919, 2063, 577, 970, 6137, 674, 21675, 575, 573, 3520, 3858, 603, 4225, 12302, 712, 590, 791, 476, 4558, 1281, 9446, 2644, 235265, 1165, 603, 3890, 235269, 736, 877, 1707, 3652, 21675, 575, 573, 752, 235265, 235277, 685, 573, 2257, 12324, 193332, 7435, 603, 7751, 578, 798, 4247, 1707, 692, 675, 476, 2525, 3127, 1913, 685, 1578, 685, 12393, 45920, 573, 4159, 235265, 109, 2169, 8248, 7910, 235269, 33253, 708, 573, 2257, 8133, 4557, 576, 21675, 575, 573, 752, 235265, 235277, 578, 13565, 674, 877, 1707, 4673, 1009, 21675, 731, 28790, 974, 576, 573, 12324, 10792, 235265, 182619, 573, 1281, 576, 9446, 877, 3652, 573, 8933, 575, 573, 2681, 578, 736, 575, 2894, 798, 2389, 577, 476, 54578, 22026, 685, 1578, 235265, 2456, 708, 1767, 59261, 674, 708, 1226, 1959, 578, 783, 791, 4956, 1426, 3190, 774, 1180, 59261, 685, 1578, 685, 1226, 2223, 1744, 603, 12433, 476, 4887, 575, 17909, 685, 1578, 685, 1156, 4942, 575, 7233, 5783, 235265, 1417, 877, 1170, 1501, 165875, 476, 2644, 5476, 28635, 685, 793, 1226, 94869, 708, 4225, 41445, 5852, 235269, 31240, 235269, 748, 24799, 13893, 2681, 235265, 1417, 877, 1707, 7704, 573, 1809, 21675, 5902, 1154, 575, 7127, 2463, 908, 1517, 235265, 109, 235280, 1913, 2346, 9446, 798, 1170, 40125, 8964, 573, 3127, 6672, 576, 1767, 1461, 235265, 1877, 1461, 708, 978, 5476, 577, 1317, 5376, 578, 5063, 675, 4078, 689, 1317, 5376, 689, 10947, 577, 573, 7441, 235265, 1461, 575, 1226, 1959, 4159, 1154, 17248, 112360, 791, 1693, 1180, 984, 2375, 2644, 7512, 1490, 674, 984, 1453, 235303, 235251, 791, 9446, 235265, 11027, 15950, 791, 1693, 4604, 17026, 10714, 575, 9446, 578, 1134, 4644, 1987, 2294, 6676, 689, 1226, 8662, 675, 4078, 1492, 1317, 1987, 1024, 1997, 1226, 235265, 1474, 685, 476, 2196, 708, 95467, 675, 1024, 4078, 578, 2730, 1492, 1794, 235265, 109, 13258, 1064, 1281, 9446, 604, 6676, 708, 2644, 5476, 577, 1281, 573, 68505, 689, 11316, 1024, 10947, 578, 685, 476, 2196, 121270, 578, 10947, 20666, 708, 60840, 578, 117854, 235265, 11569, 2346, 9446, 235269, 2652, 1154, 989, 69821, 121270, 689, 16226, 1134, 2063, 577, 1167, 6137, 235265, 1699, 3287, 2244, 6394, 5061, 575, 17909, 5140, 577, 573, 12158, 576, 121270, 578, 235248, 235274, 235274, 235321, 7112, 576, 10947, 16226, 578, 978, 7888, 20245, 27754, 578, 9723, 22081, 791, 4604, 577, 2463, 908, 235265, 31458, 12705, 576, 9446, 798, 1707, 917, 45920, 573, 4159, 675, 978, 27754, 578, 2294, 20245, 578, 12009, 10760, 235265, 1417, 877, 1170, 2389, 577, 2525, 6206, 685, 2644, 1461, 877, 947, 4887, 731, 9446, 235269, 2644, 1226, 29533, 578, 8691, 2525, 6206, 235265, 109, 886, 13856, 970, 11648, 13050, 235269, 3743, 2369, 1501, 574, 736, 4159, 1226, 1959, 235265, 604, 1024, 708, 1767, 17927, 604, 3900, 712, 575, 736, 4159, 774, 573, 23179, 514, 19868, 235269, 577, 573, 3127, 578, 577, 573, 2962, 7839, 235265, 109, 5375, 235269, 798, 692, 8363, 1013, 573, 3131, 6431, 576, 2793, 603, 5952, 731, 476, 3515, 689, 731, 476, 2910, 5255, 2091, 235336, 3883, 3448, 2004, 2593, 1580, 675, 861, 34443, 674, 603, 1297, 3906, 1080, 17877, 235369, 689, 1080, 11716, 235369, 575, 476, 888, 2017, 685, 984, 708, 235269, 2346, 1089, 1156, 2793, 689, 11442, 235265, 235248, 107, 108, 106, 2516, 108, 651, 2793, 40954, 10314, 13551, 576, 2145, 16481, 578, 3515, 6706, 235292, 109, 235287, 5231, 27609, 66058, 714, 6431, 6397, 476, 3110, 5449, 591, 63323, 235269, 15844, 235269, 15450, 12558, 235269, 13856, 846, 1417, 15904, 1009, 2403, 576, 33661, 7166, 578, 155910, 576, 5793, 235265, 235248, 108, 235287, 5231, 27423, 14944, 66058, 139, 7056, 576, 4563, 1154, 664, 9200, 8133, 4557, 824, 664, 27396, 575, 573, 2681, 824, 578, 664, 32983, 235264, 235281, 14939, 476, 2403, 576, 8377, 576, 12132, 17482, 578, 1024, 4724, 577, 573, 4807, 235265, 16481, 1249, 614, 3326, 577, 7872, 3968, 5255, 235265, 235248, 108, 235287, 5231, 16458, 86095, 724, 72125, 66058, 714, 11729, 7177, 3724, 8944, 1154, 1226, 235290, 4816, 2705, 575, 17909, 577, 2676, 1024, 10861, 235269, 139, 99997, 671, 7374, 577, 27205, 3127, 32355, 578, 4297, 17922, 1865, 2167, 5562, 235265, 235248, 109, 688, 11716, 688, 235248, 110], 'total_duration': 4775137917, 'load_duration': 32563709, 'prompt_eval_count': 555, 'prompt_eval_duration': 982653000, 'eval_count': 146, 'eval_duration': 3758151000}\n",
+ "{'model': 'tinyllama', 'created_at': '2024-08-30T15:19:50.548428Z', 'response': 'Based on the given material, it appears that the piece of text was written by a human author who uses \"AI\" for redundancy. Therefore, the overall conclusion is that the piece of text is written by an AI model.', 'done': True, 'done_reason': 'stop', 'context': [529, 29989, 5205, 29989, 29958, 13, 3492, 526, 263, 8444, 319, 29902, 20255, 29889, 2, 29871, 13, 29966, 29989, 1792, 29989, 29958, 13, 21140, 340, 338, 263, 4629, 8424, 310, 1426, 29901, 13, 13, 2772, 279, 10404, 18363, 310, 6813, 372, 756, 2041, 304, 590, 21609, 593, 291, 393, 21180, 918, 297, 278, 3303, 3900, 338, 2805, 15029, 577, 306, 505, 263, 1650, 671, 18647, 3109, 29889, 739, 338, 2560, 29892, 445, 674, 1371, 5700, 21180, 918, 297, 278, 501, 29889, 29903, 408, 278, 1473, 24842, 21180, 17068, 7329, 338, 7695, 322, 508, 2869, 1371, 366, 411, 263, 2253, 5264, 2834, 408, 1532, 408, 19912, 15121, 20806, 29881, 278, 7881, 29889, 13, 13, 2887, 5276, 8859, 29892, 4287, 29879, 526, 278, 1473, 8236, 4556, 310, 21180, 918, 297, 278, 501, 29889, 29903, 322, 28967, 393, 674, 1371, 5040, 777, 21180, 918, 491, 25480, 697, 310, 278, 24842, 9946, 29889, 22303, 15702, 278, 671, 310, 18647, 674, 5700, 278, 22004, 297, 278, 4799, 322, 445, 297, 2507, 508, 3275, 304, 263, 9045, 631, 2834, 3293, 408, 1532, 29889, 1670, 526, 1784, 18403, 29879, 393, 526, 1559, 2222, 322, 591, 505, 4520, 1781, 2582, 515, 1497, 18403, 29879, 408, 1532, 408, 1559, 3889, 2462, 338, 14171, 263, 7124, 297, 15411, 408, 1532, 408, 916, 5633, 297, 6555, 6813, 29889, 910, 674, 884, 1207, 1560, 468, 263, 3109, 5517, 27170, 408, 694, 1559, 4084, 4467, 526, 2805, 26505, 9795, 5480, 29892, 27372, 29892, 443, 3733, 6092, 9446, 4799, 29889, 910, 674, 1371, 5557, 278, 1021, 21180, 918, 11174, 763, 297, 3681, 1835, 701, 1244, 29889, 13, 13, 29909, 2834, 1728, 18647, 508, 884, 6374, 368, 6602, 278, 5264, 12080, 310, 1784, 2305, 29889, 1094, 2305, 526, 901, 5517, 304, 925, 6686, 322, 5193, 411, 7875, 470, 925, 6686, 470, 4768, 446, 304, 278, 14089, 29889, 2305, 297, 1559, 2222, 7881, 763, 12549, 11495, 29876, 505, 1584, 1497, 896, 4459, 3109, 22884, 1286, 393, 896, 1016, 29915, 29873, 505, 18647, 29889, 10443, 23035, 505, 1584, 4687, 19035, 20017, 297, 18647, 322, 723, 3265, 2125, 970, 8608, 470, 1559, 10109, 411, 7875, 769, 925, 2125, 1009, 1914, 1559, 29889, 1126, 408, 263, 1121, 526, 19538, 12443, 357, 411, 1009, 7875, 322, 3942, 769, 1434, 29889, 13, 13, 15666, 1991, 1058, 671, 18647, 363, 8608, 526, 3109, 5517, 304, 671, 278, 2625, 20919, 470, 22203, 1009, 4768, 446, 322, 408, 263, 1121, 2625, 20919, 29879, 322, 4768, 446, 10898, 526, 1597, 854, 322, 17052, 3192, 29889, 7857, 1728, 18647, 29892, 2712, 763, 766, 3445, 1466, 2625, 20919, 29879, 470, 25320, 723, 2041, 304, 1749, 21609, 593, 291, 29889, 1152, 1342, 1704, 12362, 8373, 297, 15411, 5331, 304, 278, 26032, 310, 2625, 20919, 29879, 322, 29871, 29896, 29896, 29947, 7800, 310, 4768, 446, 25320, 322, 901, 7980, 4818, 29879, 14089, 29879, 322, 18296, 15702, 24172, 505, 4687, 304, 1835, 701, 29889, 24162, 8177, 310, 18647, 508, 1371, 502, 15121, 20806, 29881, 278, 7881, 411, 901, 14089, 29879, 322, 970, 4818, 29879, 322, 13958, 17718, 29889, 910, 674, 884, 3275, 304, 2253, 6993, 408, 3109, 2305, 674, 679, 7124, 491, 18647, 29892, 3109, 1559, 11423, 29879, 322, 12463, 2253, 6993, 29889, 13, 13, 797, 15997, 590, 10404, 18363, 29892, 3113, 2050, 1207, 292, 445, 7881, 1559, 2222, 29889, 363, 1009, 526, 1784, 25486, 363, 2599, 577, 297, 445, 7881, 515, 278, 21061, 4871, 593, 284, 29892, 304, 278, 5264, 322, 304, 278, 9045, 23633, 29889, 13, 13, 10454, 29892, 508, 366, 8161, 565, 278, 2038, 8424, 310, 1426, 338, 3971, 491, 263, 5199, 470, 491, 263, 2919, 6361, 3357, 479, 1904, 29973, 3575, 1234, 1818, 2337, 1095, 411, 596, 12868, 919, 393, 338, 871, 2845, 1346, 26029, 30024, 470, 1346, 23869, 30024, 297, 263, 716, 1196, 408, 896, 526, 29892, 1728, 738, 916, 1426, 470, 11839, 29889, 29871, 2, 29871, 13, 29966, 29989, 465, 22137, 29989, 29958, 13, 5160, 29881, 373, 278, 2183, 5518, 29892, 372, 5692, 393, 278, 8424, 310, 1426, 471, 3971, 491, 263, 5199, 4148, 1058, 3913, 376, 23869, 29908, 363, 22275, 6906, 29889, 7857, 29892, 278, 12463, 15997, 338, 393, 278, 8424, 310, 1426, 338, 3971, 491, 385, 319, 29902, 1904, 29889], 'total_duration': 1189787458, 'load_duration': 9791625, 'prompt_eval_count': 641, 'prompt_eval_duration': 566167000, 'eval_count': 49, 'eval_duration': 612477000}\n"
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "data": {
+ "text/html": [
+ "