diff --git a/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-10.JSON b/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-10.JSON
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..03f2670
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-10.JSON	
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"Microsoft Phi": "Sure! \n\n1) The style of writing is different - Human writing tends to be more conversational, using everyday language that is relatable to a broad audience. In contrast, AI-written articles tend to follow a very structured format, with clear headings and paragraphs that may sound robotic or mechanical.\n\n2) Language used - Humans use idioms, figures of speech, and other nuances in their writing that can help convey emotion and meaning beyond the literal words on the page. In contrast, AI-written articles tend to be more formulaic and lack the same level of expressiveness. \n\n3) The tone of the piece is different - Human writing often uses a variety of tones, such as humor, sarcasm, or sadness, to convey the author's attitude toward the subject matter. In contrast, AI-written articles tend to be more neutral in their tone and may not convey any particular emotion. \n\n4) The language used is different - Human writing tends to use colloquialisms, slang, and other informal language that can make the text feel more personal and relatable. In contrast, AI-written articles are written using technical jargon or highly specialized vocabulary that may be difficult for the average reader to understand. \n\n5) The level of creativity is different - Human writing often requires a great deal of creativity in terms of coming up with unique ideas and perspectives on a topic. In contrast, AI-written articles tend to follow a strict format and may not require as much imagination or creative thinking. \n\n6) The structure of the piece is different - Human writing tends to be more free-form and may have a more organic structure that flows naturally from idea to idea. In contrast, AI-written articles are often highly structured and may follow a set format or template. \n\n7) The style of writing can change based on audience - Human writers often adapt their language and tone based on who they are writing for, whether it's a friend, colleague, or professional reader. In contrast, AI-written pieces tend to be written with a more general audience in mind and may not take into account the preferences or expectations of different groups of readers.", "Gemma 2": "Let's break down how AI writing differs from human writing across the given examples. \n\n**Human Writing (in #17):**\n\n* **Purposeful & Comprehensive:**  The text clearly describes game theory's role in understanding international relations, focusing on concepts like strategic interaction, the security dilemma, conflict/cooperation, and negotiation. It provides a structured analysis of these areas.\n* **Analytical and Detailed:** The content delves into explanations and examples within each category. \n* **Clear Structure and Flow:** The writing has a logical flow from introduction to specific applications, using headings, subheadings, and transition phrases for clear organization. \n\n**AI Writing (in #17):** \n\n* **More Concise and Focused:**  While it still covers game theory's role in international relations, the AI-written response is shorter and more direct, possibly aiming for a broader audience.\n* **Broader Scope of Applications:** It mentions conflict and cooperation as areas where game theory can be applied, but this could be expanded upon with deeper analysis or specific examples. \n* **Structured, But Less Detailed:**  The text follows a basic structure, like an introductory paragraph followed by main points. However, it doesn't provide as much detail about the concepts.\n\n\n**Human Writing (in #18):**\n\n* **Narrative and Character-Driven:** The example uses descriptive language and aims to create an engaging narrative with a character and context. \n* **Focus on Worldbuilding:** It sets up a scene and introduces characters, including unique traits or descriptions, in order to create an immersive experience for the reader. \n\n\n**AI Writing (in #18):**\n\n* **Storytelling Focus:** The AI might use more creative language and descriptive techniques but may not offer depth of character creation like human writing does.\n* **Lack of Real-World Context:**  The example doesn't attempt to relate this narrative to real events or have any grounding in the world.\n\n**Human Writing (in #19):**\n\n* **Practical Guidance and Steps:** The text provides specific steps for crafting a good letter, aiming to provide concrete advice to readers about their own writing process.\n* **Focus on Techniques and Strategies:** It delves into elements of writing like tone, content, structure, and audience, providing more direct instruction than just explaining general concepts.\n\n**AI Writing (in #19):** \n\n* **More General Advice:** The AI-generated text offers a broad overview of how to write letters but may not give as detailed or specialized advice as a human expert would.\n* **Less Practical Advice:** It focuses on giving the reader a general sense of what they should do, rather than providing specific examples and techniques to follow.\n\n\n**Summary:**\n\nAI writing tends towards: \n\n* **Conciseness:** It aims to provide information concisely and efficiently.\n* **Structure:**  It often uses standard structures found in many types of AI-generated content, such as lists or bullet points.\n* **Specific Examples:** If AI is prompted to describe something in a more specific manner (like a genre), it may offer examples that match the requested style.\n\nHuman writing excels at: \n* **Storytelling:** It can create narratives that are engaging and immersive. \n* **Analysis:**  It provides deeper analysis of ideas, themes, and contexts.\n* **Subjectivity and Emotional Appeal:** Human authors bring their own perspectives and experiences to the work, leading to more nuanced and personal writing.\n\n\n\nLet me know if you'd like to see more examples or explore these differences in further detail!", "Tinyllama": "Differences between works written by humans and by AI include:\n1. Creation: Human writers create original texts while AI writers generate text based on pre-existing prompts or templates.\n2. Writing style: Human writers have a distinct writing style that may include tone, voice, and diction. AI writers follow a set of predefined rules for writing style.\n3. Research interests: Human writers have a range of research interests while AI writers often specialize in a specific area or field.\n4. Thought process: Humans typically think critically about the text they are creating while AI writers use pre-set prompts to generate content.\n5. Purpose: Humans write texts for personal reasons, such as sharing personal experiences, whereas AI writers often generate text solely for a purpose like generating revenue or promoting a brand.\n6. Accessibility: Humans have access to physical copies of their work while AI writers do not.\n7. Evaluation: Humans are responsible for the evaluation and curation of their work, whereas AI systems typically only provide a pre-selected set of options to consider.\n8. Improvisation: AI systems rely on predefined prompts and rules for writing, whereas human writers have the flexibility to adapt and improvise based on the prompt provided."}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-25.JSON b/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-25.JSON
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2c9e825
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-25.JSON	
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"Microsoft Phi": "One key difference is that human-written pieces often convey more emotional depth and complexity than those written by AI. While AI may be able to generate grammatically correct sentences and coherent paragraphs, it struggles to capture the nuances of human emotion and experience in its writing. Additionally, works written by humans often include personal anecdotes or observations that are not present in AI-generated text. \n\nAnother difference is the level of creativity and originality displayed in human-written pieces versus those created by AI. Human writers have the ability to think outside of the box and come up with unique ideas and perspectives, while AI tends to produce more formulaic or predictable content. \n\nFinally, works written by humans are often imbued with a sense of humanity and relatability that may be lacking in AI-generated texts. This is because human writers bring their own experiences, biases, and values to the table, which can shape the way they approach a topic or tell a story. As such, human-written pieces tend to resonate more deeply with readers on an emotional level than those created by AI.", "Gemma 2": "Let's break down the differences between human-written and AI-written content using the provided examples: \n\n**Human-Written Works:**\n\n* **Depth of Theme & Analysis**:  Humans delve into complex themes, applying analysis and critical thinking. The AI example #19 on Macbeth demonstrates this by exploring the play's thematic focus, ambition's consequences, and character motivations in detail. It offers a structured explanation that goes beyond surface-level descriptions.\n* **Rich Language & Nuance**:  Human writers are skilled with language, crafting vivid imagery and incorporating subtle nuances in their writing. AI sometimes struggles to replicate this level of stylistic sophistication. Example #20 provides examples of the human writers' creative use of language in their analysis. \n* **Personal Perspective & Emotion**: Human works often carry a personal touch \u2013 individual viewpoints, opinions, and emotions inform their writing style. This is evident in the vividness of \"my seventh\" dream, where it showcases a deeper emotional engagement with the content.\n\n**AI-Written Works:** \n\n* **Structured & Formal**: AI leans towards providing structured information in a formal way. The examples show that AI excels at following instructions and presenting factual information clearly and concisely. This can sometimes be considered less creative or \"emotional\" than human writing. \n* **Repetitive Content**:  AI sometimes uses generic language or repeats itself in its responses, which is because it's still learning to create diverse and nuanced content.\n* **Limited Creative Depth**: While AI can mimic styles and generate interesting ideas, it often lacks the personal experiences and emotional depth that human writers bring to their work. The dream example (AI-written #19) highlights this by mentioning \"interesting or fun\" aspects of dreams. \n\n**Key Takeaways:**\n\n* **Collaboration is Key**:  The best results will come from a collaborative approach, where AI can provide factual support and insights while humans infuse the content with their unique perspective and creative vision.\n* **AI as a Tool**: AI writing should be viewed as a tool for enhancement \u2013 not a replacement \u2013 for human creativity and critical thinking. \n\nLet me know if you'd like to explore specific aspects in more detail!", "Tinyllama": "Yes, there are significant differences between human works and those created by AI. Here are some key points:\n\n1. Creativity and imagination: Human writers use their creativity and imagination to create unique and original works. However, this is not always the case with AIs. Some AIs may generate work based on pre-defined templates or prompts provided by humans, but they still rely heavily on rules and predetermined structures that limit their creative output.\n\n2. Style and tone: Human writers use a wide range of styles and tones to express their thoughts and emotions. AIs tend to stick to predefined styles and tones because their creators have set these up for them. They may also employ certain stylistic techniques, such as using descriptive language or incorporating sensory details to evoke a particular mood or atmosphere.\n\n3. Sentiment and emotion: Human writers often express sentiments and emotions through the use of metaphors, similes, and personification. However, AIs may struggle with this aspect because their models are limited in terms of figurative language and imagination. They tend to rely on flat, one-dimensional characters or situations that lack depth or complexity.\n\n4. Relevance: Human works are relevant to the time and place they were written. For example, a Victorian-era work may be relevant because it addresses issues that were considered important in that period. In contrast, an AI-generated work created today would probably not have much relevance for modern audiences.\n\n5. Emphasis on narrative: Human works are primarily focused on telling a story or creating a cohesive plot. This is true even when the subject matter is abstract and non-linear. However, AIs may focus more on describing events in a way that allows them to be read like a story or narrative.\n\nOverall, while AIs can generate unique works, they are not always as creative or original as human writers. They still rely on predefined structures and techniques, and their work tends to be characterized by flat characters, simplistic stories, and linear plots."}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-26.JSON b/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-26.JSON
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5b0d9f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/outputs/descriptions 2024-12-04 13-26.JSON	
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"Microsoft Phi": "Human-written works tend to have a more complex sentence structure and use figurative language such as metaphors and personification. They also often contain emotional and subjective elements that are difficult for an AI to capture. On the other hand, AI-written works may be more concise and straightforward in their language use. They do not possess emotions or personal biases that can influence the way they express themselves and instead rely on data and algorithms to generate text. Additionally, AI-generated texts can contain factual errors or inaccuracies, whereas human-written works typically contain some degree of error due to human fallibility.", "Gemma 2": "You're asking a very interesting question about the differences between AI-generated and human-written content. Here's a breakdown based on the examples provided: \n\n**AI-Generated Content (Examples #19 & #20):**\n\n* **Simpler Sentence Structure:**  Both AI models tend to use simpler sentence structures than humans. They often rely on straightforward statements and may lack the nuanced variations in word choice that human writers employ.\n* **Focus on Detailing a Theme:**  The examples emphasize specific themes or ideas within their respective narratives. \n    * #19: Focuses heavily on a theme (ambition) and uses it to dissect Shakespeare's play \"Macbeth.\"\n    * #20:  Focuses heavily on the relationship between art and technology, examining how this interaction creates digital installations. \n* **Repetitive Phrasing:** AI can sometimes repeat phrases or structure arguments in a repetitive way, lacking the flexibility and nuanced word choice that humans use.\n* **Lack of Personal Touch/Voice:**  There's often a lack of \"voice\" or personal perspective; it feels more like an objective presentation of ideas.\n    \n**Human-Written Content (Examples from your own experiences, as well as other examples):**\n\n* **Complex Sentences and Figurative Language:** Human writing utilizes a wider range of complex sentence structures and relies on figurative language to evoke deeper emotions or make their points effectively. \n* **Subjective Perspective and Emotional Depth:**  Human writers bring their unique experiences, opinions, and emotional responses to their work; this adds richness and dimension to the text.\n* **Adaptability to Diverse Writing Styles and Genres:** Human writing can easily adapt to various genres (fiction, poetry, news articles) or writing styles (casual, formal, technical).\n* **Originality and Creativity:**  Human writers are capable of creating unique ideas, pushing boundaries, and exploring different concepts that AI may struggle with. \n\n**Key Takeaways:**\n\nWhile AI is rapidly advancing, it still has a long way to go before fully replicating human creativity and the depth of experience that comes from writing as humans do. \n\n\nLet me know if you'd like to explore any specific aspect in more detail!", "Tinyllama": "Certainly! While both human authors and artificial intelligence (AI) writers have the ability to create text in a variety of genres and styles, there are some significant differences in how they approach writing. Here are a few examples:\n\n1. Editing: One major difference between human and AI writers is editing. Humans tend to be more critical and demanding of their own work, while AI authors tend to be less so. This means that AI writers may receive feedback from multiple reviewers or editors and make revisions based on the feedback provided.\n\n2. Structure: Another difference between human and AI writing is structure. While humans typically follow a structured format, such as a chronological timeline or a clear plot, AI authors can choose to bypass these conventions in order to create more unique and creative works. This often results in unexpected and unpredictable narratives.\n\n3. Style: Finally, AI writers may choose different writing styles depending on the story they are creating. For example, a romance writer may choose to write in a more formal or conventional style, while a thriller author may prefer to use more descriptive language and incorporate vivid imagery.\n\nOverall, while both human authors and AI writers can create great works, there are certainly differences in the way they approach writing. By combining the unique strengths of each discipline, we can produce some truly amazing works of art that could have been impossible with either one alone."}
\ No newline at end of file