I found v3!
This commit is contained in:
parent
3aba806ffa
commit
4122849b24
1 changed files with 52 additions and 0 deletions
52
notes/CWPL/CWPL_v3
Executable file
52
notes/CWPL/CWPL_v3
Executable file
|
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||
Clumsy Wolf Public """License"""
|
||||
Version 3
|
||||
|
||||
There's no copyright on this. The concept of intellectual property is bullshit,
|
||||
there only to enrich corporate CEOs who hold the copyrights to lucrative
|
||||
properties they had no hand in creating.
|
||||
|
||||
Can you say you made this? Well, physically, literally, yes. There's nothing
|
||||
stopping you from claiming this. Morally, no. You'd be a fraud and a hack to
|
||||
claim you and you alone created this. And quite frankly, I'm not sure people
|
||||
would be too happy with you were they to discover your lies.
|
||||
|
||||
Can you use this as you please? Well, physically, literally, yes. Do whatever
|
||||
you will with this. Build whatever software you want and link it to this. I
|
||||
can't stop you. However, there are uses I *strongly* condemn, and, had I the
|
||||
power, I would absolutely stop you from using this. Any software used to
|
||||
explicitly promote far-right/fascist politics is a big one, as is software used
|
||||
to further bigotry of any sort (racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia,
|
||||
enbymisia, biphobia/panphobia, aphobia, assorted miscellaneous queermisia,
|
||||
and ableism - both physical and mental, just to name a few). If you plan on
|
||||
making that kind of software, literally you can use this, but honestly, I'd
|
||||
quite prefer you to fuck right off. I mean, really, do you really want to use
|
||||
this anyways? Some piece of software built a someone who's trans fem,
|
||||
pansexual, non-binary in a non-specific way, aromantic, clinically anxious and
|
||||
depressed, and otherkin? Surely, you can find some """better""" software
|
||||
created by someone you'd think much more highly of, right? Or is this piece
|
||||
of software really better than anything your "master race" can produce? Because
|
||||
if so, I'd start to reconsider if it's really the "master race".
|
||||
|
||||
Can you change the software as you please? Again, yeah. And you don't even need
|
||||
to tell me. Obviously, you shouldn't claim that the original creators of this
|
||||
software made those changes. As above, people mightn't be happy with you if
|
||||
you were to slander us and they were to discover your lies. But you can change
|
||||
this as you wish.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, there is no warranty. There never is. Sure, it might work well, but
|
||||
it might not. You're using this "AS IS" without any sort of guarantee that it
|
||||
will work well or work for what you're using it for. It might not work at all.
|
||||
If it breaks (or breaks something), that's entirely on you. I mean, we sure
|
||||
can't afford to pay for your shit breaking. So, use this at your own risk. If
|
||||
something breaks, it's not our fault. Sorry :P
|
||||
|
||||
If you decide to make your own version of this software, do you have to keep
|
||||
this """license"""? No. You can. You can change it up as you please. Make it
|
||||
your own. Or keep it as is. Or use a different license. Up to you. My
|
||||
(the writer's) suggestion? 0BSD. Nice little open license. Or, if you don't
|
||||
want, like, relicensing really, 2BSD. But, like, please don't use GPL or related
|
||||
licenses. They're kinda just...shit.
|
||||
|
||||
Incidentally, if you do make your own version, do us a favour and change the
|
||||
name. Or, at the very least, add something to the name to indicate it's not the
|
||||
original.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue