nigig-org/crates/robius-sms/tests/sms_pipeline.rs

//! Integration tests for the SMS pipeline (Phase G).
//!
//! These exercise the crate through its PUBLIC API only, the way the
//! application uses it. The unit tests inside `src/` can see private
//! helpers; these cannot, which is the point — they catch the case where
//! an internal refactor keeps every unit test green while breaking the
//! surface a caller actually touches.
//!
//! Everything here runs on any host. The device-only paths (JNI, the
//! keystore, broadcast delivery) still need an emulator and are called
//! out in the Phase A/E commit messages rather than faked here: a mock
//! that returns what I expect would test my expectations, not Android.

use robius_sms::{
    BulkSendRequest, MessageKind, ScheduleRequest, SendOutcome, SendRateLimiter, SendReport,
    SendRequest, SmsEncoding, segment_count,
};

// ─── The fixture inbox the desktop build ships ────────────────────────

#[test]
fn dummy_inbox_is_coherent_enough_to_drive_the_ui() {
    let messages = robius_sms::dummy_messages();
    let threads = robius_sms::dummy_threads();

    assert!(!messages.is_empty(), "desktop builds render this");
    assert!(!threads.is_empty());

    // Every message must belong to a thread the thread list also knows
    // about, or the conversation list shows a row that opens onto
    // nothing.
    let thread_ids: Vec<i64> = threads.iter().map(|t| t.thread_id).collect();
    for m in &messages {
        let tid = m.thread_id.expect("fixture messages carry a thread id");
        assert!(
            thread_ids.contains(&tid),
            "message {} references thread {tid}, which is not in dummy_threads()",
            m.id
        );
    }

    // Ids must be unique: the UI keys rows on them.
    let mut ids: Vec<i64> = messages.iter().map(|m| m.id).collect();
    ids.sort_unstable();
    let before = ids.len();
    ids.dedup();
    assert_eq!(before, ids.len(), "duplicate message ids in the fixture");
}

#[test]
fn fixture_covers_both_directions_and_a_short_code() {
    let messages = robius_sms::dummy_messages();

    assert!(
        messages.iter().any(|m| m.kind == MessageKind::Inbox),
        "no received message: the bubble layout would never be exercised"
    );
    assert!(
        messages.iter().any(|m| m.kind == MessageKind::Sent),
        "no sent message"
    );
    // C1 relies on alphanumeric senders NOT normalising to digits.
    assert!(
        messages
            .iter()
            .any(|m| m.address.as_deref().is_some_and(|a| a.chars().any(|c| c.is_alphabetic()))),
        "no alphanumeric sender (Safaricom-style) in the fixture"
    );
}

// ─── Cost, end to end ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

#[test]
fn a_bulk_campaign_reports_its_true_segment_cost() {
    // The scenario the bulk UI makes two taps away: one body, many
    // recipients, scraped from a directory.
    let body = "Dear customer, our new branch opens Monday. \
                Visit us for 20% off all items this week only. \
                Reply STOP to opt out.";
    let recipients: Vec<String> = (0..200)
        .map(|i| format!("+2547{:08}", 10_000_000 + i))
        .collect();

    let request = BulkSendRequest {
        recipients: recipients.clone(),
        body: body.to_string(),
    };
    assert!(request.validate().is_ok());

    let per_message = segment_count(body);
    assert_eq!(per_message.encoding, SmsEncoding::Gsm7);

    let total = per_message.segments * recipients.len();
    assert!(
        total >= recipients.len(),
        "a campaign can never cost less than one segment per recipient"
    );

    // E8: the limiter stops this well short of the full 200.
    let mut rl = SendRateLimiter::default();
    let sent = (0..recipients.len() as i64).filter(|i| rl.allow_at(*i).is_ok()).count();
    assert_eq!(sent, SendRateLimiter::DEFAULT_CAPACITY as usize);
    assert!(sent < recipients.len(), "the whole batch reached the carrier");
}

#[test]
fn one_emoji_changes_what_a_campaign_costs() {
    // A5/F10. This is the trap the UI has to surface before sending:
    // the same copy, one emoji added, bills differently.
    let plain = "a".repeat(100);
    let with_emoji = format!("{plain}🎉");

    let a = segment_count(&plain);
    let b = segment_count(&with_emoji);

    assert_eq!(a.encoding, SmsEncoding::Gsm7);
    assert_eq!(a.segments, 1);
    assert_eq!(b.encoding, SmsEncoding::Ucs2);
    assert!(b.segments > a.segments, "UCS-2 must split a 100-char body");
}

// ─── Validation at the boundary ───────────────────────────────────────

#[test]
fn c7_a_blank_line_in_the_recipient_box_is_rejected() {
    // The app parses the recipients textarea by lines, so a stray blank
    // line arrives as an empty recipient. Before C7 the app's own send
    // loop skipped this check entirely.
    let r = BulkSendRequest {
        recipients: vec!["+254712345678".into(), "   ".into()],
        body: "hi".into(),
    };
    assert!(r.validate().is_err());
}

#[test]
fn a4_the_one_shot_schedule_the_ui_builds_is_accepted() {
    // The exact shape sms_schedule_page.rs constructs. Under the old
    // validator every scheduled message on Android failed with
    // InvalidInput -- an entire feature that could never once have run.
    let r = ScheduleRequest {
        id: 1001,
        recipient: "+254712345678".into(),
        body: "Reminder: your appointment is tomorrow.".into(),
        first_trigger_at_ms: 1_719_820_800_000,
        interval_ms: None,
    };
    assert!(r.validate().is_ok(), "one-shot schedules must be sendable");
}

#[test]
fn a_repeating_schedule_still_requires_a_positive_interval() {
    let r = ScheduleRequest {
        id: 1,
        recipient: "+254712345678".into(),
        body: "x".into(),
        first_trigger_at_ms: 1,
        interval_ms: Some(0),
    };
    assert!(r.validate().is_err(), "a zero interval would loop the alarm");
}

#[test]
fn send_requests_reject_empty_input() {
    // send_sms validates before touching the platform, so these never
    // reach a radio.
    for (recipient, body) in [("", "hi"), ("   ", "hi"), ("+254712345678", "")] {
        let req = SendRequest {
            recipient: recipient.into(),
            body: body.into(),
        };
        // No platform here, so this is PermanentlyUnavailable at worst --
        // the point is that it never panics and never claims success.
        assert!(robius_sms::send_sms(&req).is_err());
    }
}

// ─── Truthful status (E7) ─────────────────────────────────────────────

#[test]
fn e7_sent_and_delivered_are_distinguishable_outcomes() {
    // Before E7 both PendingIntents were null, so nothing could report
    // back and `Ok` collapsed radio-accepted, delivered and failed into
    // one value the UI rendered as a tick.
    let sent = SendReport { token: 1, outcome: SendOutcome::Sent };
    let delivered = SendReport { token: 1, outcome: SendOutcome::Delivered };
    let failed = SendReport {
        token: 1,
        outcome: SendOutcome::SendFailed { code: 4 }, // RESULT_ERROR_NO_SERVICE
    };

    assert!(sent.outcome.is_ok());
    assert!(delivered.outcome.is_ok());
    assert!(!failed.outcome.is_ok());
    assert_ne!(sent.outcome, delivered.outcome);
}

#[test]
fn e7_reports_start_empty_on_a_platform_that_cannot_send() {
    // No Android here, so nothing can have been sent and nothing can
    // have reported back. Must be empty rather than panicking.
    assert!(robius_sms::take_send_reports().is_empty());
}

// ─── Unsupported platforms are honest (C3/F2) ─────────────────────────

#[test]
fn c3_unsupported_platforms_say_unsupported_not_unknown() {
    // sys/unsupported.rs used to return Error::Unknown for all twelve
    // functions where every other stub returned PermanentlyUnavailable,
    // so a caller was told "Unknown error" instead of "not supported
    // here". F2 then collapsed the four duplicate stub files into one,
    // which is what keeps them from drifting again.
    let err = robius_sms::list_messages().unwrap_err();
    assert_eq!(
        err.to_string(),
        "Permanently unavailable on this platform",
        "stub backends must be honest about why they failed"
    );
}