mirror of
https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs
synced 2024-08-14 10:26:42 +00:00
Silence GitHub's reminder to add a code of conduct.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a060ae39b1
commit
65953d0d99
2 changed files with 104 additions and 0 deletions
52
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Normal file
52
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||
# Code of Merit
|
||||
|
||||
1. The project creators, lead developers, core team, constitute
|
||||
the managing members of the project and have final say in every decision
|
||||
of the project, technical or otherwise, including overruling previous decisions.
|
||||
There are no limitations to this decisional power.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Contributions are an expected result of your membership on the project.
|
||||
Don't expect others to do your work or help you with your work forever.
|
||||
|
||||
3. All members have the same opportunities to seek any challenge they want
|
||||
within the project.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Authority or position in the project will be proportional
|
||||
to the accrued contribution. Seniority must be earned.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Software is evolutive: the better implementations must supersede lesser
|
||||
implementations. Technical advantage is the primary evaluation metric.
|
||||
|
||||
6. This is a space for technical prowess; topics outside of the project
|
||||
will not be tolerated.
|
||||
|
||||
7. Non technical conflicts will be discussed in a separate space. Disruption
|
||||
of the project will not be allowed.
|
||||
|
||||
8. Individual characteristics, including but not limited to,
|
||||
body, sex, sexual preference, race, language, religion, nationality,
|
||||
or political preferences are irrelevant in the scope of the project and
|
||||
will not be taken into account concerning your value or that of your contribution
|
||||
to the project.
|
||||
|
||||
9. Discuss or debate the idea, not the person.
|
||||
|
||||
10. There is no room for ambiguity: Ambiguity will be met with questioning;
|
||||
further ambiguity will be met with silence. It is the responsibility
|
||||
of the originator to provide requested context.
|
||||
|
||||
11. If something is illegal outside the scope of the project, it is illegal
|
||||
in the scope of the project. This Code of Merit does not take precedence over
|
||||
governing law.
|
||||
|
||||
12. This Code of Merit governs the technical procedures of the project not the
|
||||
activities outside of it.
|
||||
|
||||
13. Participation on the project equates to agreement of this Code of Merit.
|
||||
|
||||
14. No objectives beyond the stated objectives of this project are relevant
|
||||
to the project. Any intent to deviate the project from its original purpose
|
||||
of existence will constitute grounds for remedial action which may include
|
||||
expulsion from the project.
|
||||
|
||||
This document is the Code of Merit (http://code-of-merit.org), version 1.0.
|
52
CODE_OF_MERIT.md
Normal file
52
CODE_OF_MERIT.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||
# Code of Merit
|
||||
|
||||
1. The project creators, lead developers, core team, constitute
|
||||
the managing members of the project and have final say in every decision
|
||||
of the project, technical or otherwise, including overruling previous decisions.
|
||||
There are no limitations to this decisional power.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Contributions are an expected result of your membership on the project.
|
||||
Don't expect others to do your work or help you with your work forever.
|
||||
|
||||
3. All members have the same opportunities to seek any challenge they want
|
||||
within the project.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Authority or position in the project will be proportional
|
||||
to the accrued contribution. Seniority must be earned.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Software is evolutive: the better implementations must supersede lesser
|
||||
implementations. Technical advantage is the primary evaluation metric.
|
||||
|
||||
6. This is a space for technical prowess; topics outside of the project
|
||||
will not be tolerated.
|
||||
|
||||
7. Non technical conflicts will be discussed in a separate space. Disruption
|
||||
of the project will not be allowed.
|
||||
|
||||
8. Individual characteristics, including but not limited to,
|
||||
body, sex, sexual preference, race, language, religion, nationality,
|
||||
or political preferences are irrelevant in the scope of the project and
|
||||
will not be taken into account concerning your value or that of your contribution
|
||||
to the project.
|
||||
|
||||
9. Discuss or debate the idea, not the person.
|
||||
|
||||
10. There is no room for ambiguity: Ambiguity will be met with questioning;
|
||||
further ambiguity will be met with silence. It is the responsibility
|
||||
of the originator to provide requested context.
|
||||
|
||||
11. If something is illegal outside the scope of the project, it is illegal
|
||||
in the scope of the project. This Code of Merit does not take precedence over
|
||||
governing law.
|
||||
|
||||
12. This Code of Merit governs the technical procedures of the project not the
|
||||
activities outside of it.
|
||||
|
||||
13. Participation on the project equates to agreement of this Code of Merit.
|
||||
|
||||
14. No objectives beyond the stated objectives of this project are relevant
|
||||
to the project. Any intent to deviate the project from its original purpose
|
||||
of existence will constitute grounds for remedial action which may include
|
||||
expulsion from the project.
|
||||
|
||||
This document is the Code of Merit (http://code-of-merit.org), version 1.0.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue